Formal evaluation of persona trustworthiness with EUSTACE (extended abstract)

This source preferred by Shamal Faily

Authors: Faily, S., Power, D., Armstrong, P. and Flechais, I.

Journal: Trust and Trustworthy Computing, 6th International Conference, TRUST 2013

Pages: 267-268

This data was imported from DBLP:

Authors: Faily, S., Power, D., Armstrong, P. and Flechais, I.

Editors: Huth, M., Asokan, N., Capkun, S., Flechais, I. and Coles-Kemp, L.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38908-5

Journal: TRUST

Volume: 7904

Pages: 267-268

Publisher: Springer

ISBN: 978-3-642-38907-8

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38908-5_20

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Faily, S., Power, D., Armstrong, P. and Fléchais, I.

Journal: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volume: 7904 LNCS

Pages: 267-268

eISSN: 1611-3349

ISBN: 9783642389078

ISSN: 0302-9743

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38908-5_20

Personas are useful for considering how users of a system might behave, but problematic when accounting for hidden behaviours not obvious from their descriptions alone. Formal methods can potentially identify such subtleties in interactive systems, but we lack methods for eliciting models from qualitative persona descriptions. We present a framework for eliciting and specifying formal models of persona behaviour that a persona might, in certain circumstances, engage in. We also summarise our preliminary work to date evaluating this framework. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

The data on this page was last updated at 04:42 on September 22, 2017.