Academic ethics: what has morality, culture and administration got to do with its measurement?

This source preferred by Gbola Gbadamosi

Authors: Gbadamosi, G.

Journal: Management Decision

Volume: 42

Pages: 1145-1161

ISSN: 0025-1747

DOI: 10.1108/00251740410565172

While there is no dearth of studies on ethical issues, the specific subject of examination misconduct has attracted fewer studies, especially in Africa. This study is an ongoing exploratory attempt to develop a measure of examination misconduct. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data from 450 undergraduate business students of the Universities of Botswana and Swaziland. A nine-item measure of examination misconduct was correlated with a measure of perception of business ethics, ethical value assessment and Hofstedeā€™s four dimensions of culture.

The results indicated significant inter-correlations among the variables (especially the three measures of ethics) and limited construct validity for the examination misconduct scale. The results of factor analysis suggest three factors for the emerging scale: cheating behaviour, intervention and desperation. The ethical inferences of the findings, managerial implications for university administrators and practitioners, study limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

The data on this page was last updated at 04:40 on November 19, 2017.