Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input
Authors: Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. and Rayner, K.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume: 106
Issue: 50
Pages: 21086-21090
eISSN: 1091-6490
ISSN: 0027-8424
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907664106
Abstract:In prevailing approaches to human sentence comprehension, the outcome of the word recognition process is assumed to be a categorical representation with no residual uncertainty. Yet perception is inevitably uncertain, and a system making optimal use of available information might retain this uncertainty and interactively recruit grammatical analysis and subsequent perceptual input to help resolve it. To test for the possibility of such an interaction, we tracked readers' eye movements as they read sentences constructed to vary in (i) whether an early word had near neighbors of a different grammatical category, and (ii) how strongly another word further downstream cohered grammatically with these potential near neighbors. Eye movements indicated that readers maintain uncertain beliefs about previously read word identities, revise these beliefs on the basis of relative grammatical consistency with subsequent input, and use these changing beliefs to guide saccadic behavior in ways consistent with principles of rational probabilistic inference.
Source: Scopus
Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input.
Authors: Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. and Rayner, K.
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Volume: 106
Issue: 50
Pages: 21086-21090
eISSN: 1091-6490
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907664106
Abstract:In prevailing approaches to human sentence comprehension, the outcome of the word recognition process is assumed to be a categorical representation with no residual uncertainty. Yet perception is inevitably uncertain, and a system making optimal use of available information might retain this uncertainty and interactively recruit grammatical analysis and subsequent perceptual input to help resolve it. To test for the possibility of such an interaction, we tracked readers' eye movements as they read sentences constructed to vary in (i) whether an early word had near neighbors of a different grammatical category, and (ii) how strongly another word further downstream cohered grammatically with these potential near neighbors. Eye movements indicated that readers maintain uncertain beliefs about previously read word identities, revise these beliefs on the basis of relative grammatical consistency with subsequent input, and use these changing beliefs to guide saccadic behavior in ways consistent with principles of rational probabilistic inference.
Source: PubMed
Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input
Authors: Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. and Rayner, K.
Journal: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Volume: 106
Issue: 50
Pages: 21086-21090
ISSN: 0027-8424
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907664106
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input.
Authors: Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. and Rayner, K.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume: 106
Issue: 50
Pages: 21086-21090
eISSN: 1091-6490
ISSN: 0027-8424
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907664106
Abstract:In prevailing approaches to human sentence comprehension, the outcome of the word recognition process is assumed to be a categorical representation with no residual uncertainty. Yet perception is inevitably uncertain, and a system making optimal use of available information might retain this uncertainty and interactively recruit grammatical analysis and subsequent perceptual input to help resolve it. To test for the possibility of such an interaction, we tracked readers' eye movements as they read sentences constructed to vary in (i) whether an early word had near neighbors of a different grammatical category, and (ii) how strongly another word further downstream cohered grammatically with these potential near neighbors. Eye movements indicated that readers maintain uncertain beliefs about previously read word identities, revise these beliefs on the basis of relative grammatical consistency with subsequent input, and use these changing beliefs to guide saccadic behavior in ways consistent with principles of rational probabilistic inference.
Source: Europe PubMed Central