Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task
Authors: Angele, B., Slattery, T.J. and Rayner, K.
Journal: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume: 23
Issue: 4
Pages: 1241-1249
eISSN: 1531-5320
ISSN: 1069-9384
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
Abstract:We used a display change detection paradigm (Slattery, Angele, & Rayner Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924–1938 2011) to investigate whether display change detection uses orthographic regularity and whether detection is affected by the processing difficulty of the word preceding the boundary that triggers the display change. Subjects were significantly more sensitive to display changes when the change was from a nonwordlike preview than when the change was from a wordlike preview, but the preview benefit effect on the target word was not affected by whether the preview was wordlike or nonwordlike. Additionally, we did not find any influence of preboundary word frequency on display change detection performance. Our results suggest that display change detection and lexical processing do not use the same cognitive mechanisms. We propose that parafoveal processing takes place in two stages: an early, orthography-based, preattentional stage, and a late, attention-dependent lexical access stage.
Source: Scopus
Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task.
Authors: Angele, B., Slattery, T.J. and Rayner, K.
Journal: Psychon Bull Rev
Volume: 23
Issue: 4
Pages: 1241-1249
eISSN: 1531-5320
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
Abstract:We used a display change detection paradigm (Slattery, Angele, & Rayner Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924-1938 2011) to investigate whether display change detection uses orthographic regularity and whether detection is affected by the processing difficulty of the word preceding the boundary that triggers the display change. Subjects were significantly more sensitive to display changes when the change was from a nonwordlike preview than when the change was from a wordlike preview, but the preview benefit effect on the target word was not affected by whether the preview was wordlike or nonwordlike. Additionally, we did not find any influence of preboundary word frequency on display change detection performance. Our results suggest that display change detection and lexical processing do not use the same cognitive mechanisms. We propose that parafoveal processing takes place in two stages: an early, orthography-based, preattentional stage, and a late, attention-dependent lexical access stage.
Source: PubMed
Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task
Authors: Angele, B., Slattery, T.J. and Rayner, K.
Journal: PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
Volume: 23
Issue: 4
Pages: 1241-1249
eISSN: 1531-5320
ISSN: 1069-9384
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task
Authors: Angele, B., Slattery, T.J. and Rayner, K.
Journal: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Pages: 1-9
ISSN: 1531-5320
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
Abstract:We used a display change detection paradigm (Slattery, Angele, & Rayner Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924–1938 2011) to investigate whether display change detection uses orthographic regularity and whether detection is affected by the processing difficulty of the word preceding the boundary that triggers the display change. Subjects were significantly more sensitive to display changes when the change was from a nonwordlike preview than when the change was from a wordlike preview, but the preview benefit effect on the target word was not affected by whether the preview was wordlike or nonwordlike. Additionally, we did not find any influence of preboundary word frequency on display change detection performance. Our results suggest that display change detection and lexical processing do not use the same cognitive mechanisms. We propose that parafoveal processing takes place in two stages: an early, orthography-based, preattentional stage, and a late, attention-dependent lexical access stage.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
Source: Manual
Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task.
Authors: Angele, B., Slattery, T.J. and Rayner, K.
Journal: Psychonomic bulletin & review
Volume: 23
Issue: 4
Pages: 1241-1249
eISSN: 1531-5320
ISSN: 1069-9384
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0995-0
Abstract:We used a display change detection paradigm (Slattery, Angele, & Rayner Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1924-1938 2011) to investigate whether display change detection uses orthographic regularity and whether detection is affected by the processing difficulty of the word preceding the boundary that triggers the display change. Subjects were significantly more sensitive to display changes when the change was from a nonwordlike preview than when the change was from a wordlike preview, but the preview benefit effect on the target word was not affected by whether the preview was wordlike or nonwordlike. Additionally, we did not find any influence of preboundary word frequency on display change detection performance. Our results suggest that display change detection and lexical processing do not use the same cognitive mechanisms. We propose that parafoveal processing takes place in two stages: an early, orthography-based, preattentional stage, and a late, attention-dependent lexical access stage.
Source: Europe PubMed Central