How does usage of a weight-management intervention vary by context? The story of POWeR

This source preferred by Charlie Hargood and Emily Arden-Close

Authors: Morrison, L., Arden-Close, E., Bradbury, K., Smith, E., Michaelides, D., Hargood, C., Weal, M., Little, P. and Yardley, L.

Journal: European Health Psychologist

Volume: 17

Issue: S

Background: POWeR, a web-based weight management intervention, has been trialled in a range of implementation settings. We provide an in-depth comparison of previously unexplored usage patterns across these settings using new visualisation software. Methods: A feasibility trial (N=179) and full RCT (N=834) compared the effect of POWeR with varying levels of nurse support. A community-based public health trial examined the role of brief telephone coaching (N=786). A workplace-based observational study examined usage of POWeR alongside a supplemental Smartphone app (N=942). Findings: Visual analysis enabled comparison of usage patterns within and across each study. For example, a greater proportion of app users than web-only users in the workplace study accessed problem solving advice (33.33% vs. 9.30%), X2(1,N=942)=31.17, p<.001, and optional content (18.33% vs. 4.08%), X2(1, N=942)=21.16, p<.001. Discussion: Comparison of usage patterns across and within different implementation settings can generate explanations for continued engagement or disengagement with health behaviour change interventions, thus helping to improve future implementation.

The data on this page was last updated at 04:42 on September 20, 2017.