A qualitative case study of LifeGuide: Users' experiences of software for developing Internet-based behaviour change interventions

This source preferred by Sarah Muir

This data was imported from PubMed:

Authors: Williams, S., Yardley, L. and Wills, G.B.

Journal: Health Informatics J

Volume: 19

Issue: 1

Pages: 61-75

eISSN: 1741-2811

DOI: 10.1177/1460458212458915

Previously, behavioural scientists seeking to create Internet-based behaviour change interventions have had to rely on computer scientists to actually develop and modify web interventions. The LifeGuide software was designed to enable behavioural researchers to develop and adapt Internet-based behavioural interventions themselves. This article reports a qualitative case study of users' experiences and perceptions of the LifeGuide software. The aim was to explore users' experiences and their perceptions of the benefits and limitations of this approach to intervention development. Twenty LifeGuide users took part in semi-structured interviews and one provided feedback via email. Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes: 'Recognising LifeGuide's potential', 'I'm not a programmer' and 'Knowledge sharing - the future of LifeGuide'. Users valued LifeGuide's potential to allow them to flexibly develop and modify interventions at little cost. However, users noted that their lack of programming experience meant that they needed to learn new skills for using the software, and they varied in the extent to which they felt able to develop interventions without any input from programmers. Respondents saw the potential of using the LifeGuide Community Website to share technical support and examples of intervention components to support their use of LifeGuide.

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Williams, S., Yardley, L. and Wills, G.B.

Journal: Health Informatics Journal

Volume: 19

Issue: 1

Pages: 61-75

eISSN: 1741-2811

ISSN: 1460-4582

DOI: 10.1177/1460458212458915

Previously, behavioural scientists seeking to create Internet-based behaviour change interventions have had to rely on computer scientists to actually develop and modify web interventions. The LifeGuide software was designed to enable behavioural researchers to develop and adapt Internet-based behavioural interventions themselves. This article reports a qualitative case study of users' experiences and perceptions of the LifeGuide software. The aim was to explore users' experiences and their perceptions of the benefits and limitations of this approach to intervention development. Twenty LifeGuide users took part in semi-structured interviews and one provided feedback via email. Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes: 'Recognising LifeGuide's potential', 'I'm not a programmer' and 'Knowledge sharing - the future of LifeGuide'. Users valued LifeGuide's potential to allow them to flexibly develop and modify interventions at little cost. However, users noted that their lack of programming experience meant that they needed to learn new skills for using the software, and they varied in the extent to which they felt able to develop interventions without any input from programmers. Respondents saw the potential of using the LifeGuide Community Website to share technical support and examples of intervention components to support their use of LifeGuide. © The Author(s) 2013.

This data was imported from Web of Science (Lite):

Authors: Williams, S., Yardley, L. and Wills, G.B.

Journal: HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL

Volume: 19

Issue: 1

Pages: 61-75

eISSN: 1741-2811

ISSN: 1460-4582

DOI: 10.1177/1460458212458915

This data was imported from Europe PubMed Central:

Authors: Williams, S., Yardley, L. and Wills, G.B.

Journal: Health informatics journal

Volume: 19

Issue: 1

Pages: 61-75

eISSN: 1741-2811

ISSN: 1460-4582

Previously, behavioural scientists seeking to create Internet-based behaviour change interventions have had to rely on computer scientists to actually develop and modify web interventions. The LifeGuide software was designed to enable behavioural researchers to develop and adapt Internet-based behavioural interventions themselves. This article reports a qualitative case study of users' experiences and perceptions of the LifeGuide software. The aim was to explore users' experiences and their perceptions of the benefits and limitations of this approach to intervention development. Twenty LifeGuide users took part in semi-structured interviews and one provided feedback via email. Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes: 'Recognising LifeGuide's potential', 'I'm not a programmer' and 'Knowledge sharing - the future of LifeGuide'. Users valued LifeGuide's potential to allow them to flexibly develop and modify interventions at little cost. However, users noted that their lack of programming experience meant that they needed to learn new skills for using the software, and they varied in the extent to which they felt able to develop interventions without any input from programmers. Respondents saw the potential of using the LifeGuide Community Website to share technical support and examples of intervention components to support their use of LifeGuide.

The data on this page was last updated at 04:53 on April 26, 2019.