GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice: Evidence from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities
Authors: Baines, D.L., Brigham, P., Phillips, D.R., Tolley, K.H. and Whynes, D.K.
Journal: Public Health
Volume: 111
Issue: 5
Pages: 321-325
ISSN: 0033-3506
DOI: 10.1016/S0033-3506(97)00062-0
Abstract:Background: Two separate prescribing budget regimes (part of GP fundholding and the indicative prescribing scheme) were introduced into UK general practice in April 1991 in an attempt to contain the growth in NHS expenditure on prescribed drugs. Objectives: The aims of this study are (i) to examine whether the fundholding scheme has been more effective at containing prescribing cost growth than the indicative prescribing scheme and (ii) to ascertain whether its implementation, at a practice level, has been affected by local circumstances and conditions. Methods: Prescribing cost data were collected from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities for the financial years 1990/1991 to 1993/1994. Exploratory analysis was performed using regression analysis and non-parametric statistical techniques. Results and conclusions: Initially, the fundholding scheme has been the more effective at containing expenditure on prescribed drugs. However, the implementation of the schemes in rural areas has probably been affected by the existence of practices with permission to dispense drugs to their own patients, due to a lack of pharmacies in such areas.
Source: Scopus
GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice: evidence from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities.
Authors: Baines, D.L., Brigham, P., Phillips, D.R., Tolley, K.H. and Whynes, D.K.
Journal: Public Health
Volume: 111
Issue: 5
Pages: 321-325
ISSN: 0033-3506
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Two separate prescribing budget regimes (part of GP fundholding and the indicative prescribing scheme) were introduced into UK general practice in April 1991 in an attempt to contain the growth in NHS expenditure on prescribed drugs. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study are (i) to examine whether the fundholding scheme has been more effective at containing prescribing cost growth than the indicative prescribing scheme and (ii) to ascertain whether its implementation, at a practice level, has been affected by local circumstances and conditions. METHODS: Prescribing cost data were collected from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities for the financial years 1990/1991 to 1993/1994. Exploratory analysis was performed using regression analysis and nonparametric statistical techniques. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Initially, the fundholding scheme has been the more effective at containing expenditure on prescribed drugs. However, the implementation of the schemes in rural areas has probably been affected by the existence of practices with permission to dispense drugs to their own patients, due to a lack of pharmacies in such areas.
Source: PubMed
GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice: evidence from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities
Authors: Baines, D.L., Brigham, P., Phillips, D.R., Tolley, K.H. and Whynes, D.K.
Journal: PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume: 111
Issue: 5
Pages: 321-325
ISSN: 0033-3506
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900377
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice: evidence from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities.
Authors: Baines, D.L., Brigham, P., Phillips, D.R., Tolley, K.H. and Whynes, D.K.
Journal: Public health
Volume: 111
Issue: 5
Pages: 321-325
eISSN: 1476-5616
ISSN: 0033-3506
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900377
Abstract:Background
Two separate prescribing budget regimes (part of GP fundholding and the indicative prescribing scheme) were introduced into UK general practice in April 1991 in an attempt to contain the growth in NHS expenditure on prescribed drugs.Objectives
The aims of this study are (i) to examine whether the fundholding scheme has been more effective at containing prescribing cost growth than the indicative prescribing scheme and (ii) to ascertain whether its implementation, at a practice level, has been affected by local circumstances and conditions.Methods
Prescribing cost data were collected from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities for the financial years 1990/1991 to 1993/1994. Exploratory analysis was performed using regression analysis and nonparametric statistical techniques.Results and conclusions
Initially, the fundholding scheme has been the more effective at containing expenditure on prescribed drugs. However, the implementation of the schemes in rural areas has probably been affected by the existence of practices with permission to dispense drugs to their own patients, due to a lack of pharmacies in such areas.Source: Europe PubMed Central