The changing face of protests in the digital age: On occupying cyberspace and Distributed-Denial-of-Services (DDoS) attacks

This source preferred by Argyro Karanasiou

Authors: Karanasiou, A.

Journal: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology

DOI: 10.1080/13600869.2014.870638

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Karanasiou, A.P.

Journal: International Review of Law, Computers and Technology

Volume: 28

Issue: 1

Pages: 98-113

eISSN: 1364-6885

ISSN: 1360-0869

DOI: 10.1080/13600869.2014.870638

On 7th January 2013 the Anonymous hacking collective launched a White House petition asking the Obama administration to recognize DDoS 1 attacks as a valid form of protest, similar to the Occupy protests. The 'Occupy' movement against financial inequality has become an international protest phenomenon stirring up the debate on the legal responses to acts of civil disobedience. At the same time, online attacks in the form of DDoS are considered by many as the digital counterparts of protesting. While the law generally acknowledges a certain level of protection for protesting as a manifestation of the rights to free speech and free assembly, it is still unclear whether DDoS attacks could qualify as free speech. This paper examines the analogies between offline protests and DDoS attacks, discusses legal responses in both cases and seeks to explore the scope for free speech protection. © 2014 © 2014 Taylor & Francis.

The data on this page was last updated at 04:43 on March 21, 2018.