Analysing and visualising security and usability in IRIS

This source preferred by Shamal Faily

Authors: Faily, S. and Flechais, I.

Journal: Availability, Reliability and Security, 2010. ARES 10. Fifth International Conference on

This data was imported from DBLP:

Authors: Faily, S. and Flechais, I.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5437532

Journal: ARES

Pages: 543-548

Publisher: IEEE Computer Society

ISBN: 978-0-7695-3965-2

DOI: 10.1109/ARES.2010.28

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Faily, S. and Fléchais, I.

Journal: ARES 2010 - 5th International Conference on Availability, Reliability, and Security

Pages: 543-548

ISBN: 9780769539652

DOI: 10.1109/ARES.2010.28

Despite a long standing need to incorporate human factors into security risk analysis, taking a balanced approach to analysing security and usability concerns remains a challenge. Balancing security and usability is difficult due to human biases in security perception, and managing the sheer volume of data arising from risk and task analysis. This paper presents an approach for qualitatively and quantitively analysing and visualising the results of risk and task analysis. We demonstrate this approach using a realistic example, and we discuss how these techniques fit within the larger context of secure systems design. © 2010 IEEE.

The data on this page was last updated at 04:43 on November 23, 2017.