Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries
Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.
Volume: 232
Pages: 207-216
eISSN: 1875-7855
ISSN: 0079-6123
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005
Abstract:Hardy et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large-scale, multisource, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of super-elite (SE) and a group of elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Elite Performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative Approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/
Source: Scopus
Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries.
Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.
Journal: Prog Brain Res
Volume: 232
Pages: 207-216
eISSN: 1875-7855
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005
Abstract:Hardy et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large-scale, multisource, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of super-elite (SE) and a group of elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Elite Performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative Approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/
Source: PubMed
Preferred by: Tim Rees
Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries
Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.
Journal: SPORT AND THE BRAIN: THE SCIENCE OF PREPARING, ENDURING AND WINNING, PT A
Volume: 232
Pages: 207-216
ISSN: 0079-6123
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries
Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.
Editors: Wilson, M., Walsh, V. and Parkin, B.
Journal: Progress in Brain Research
Pages: 207-216
ISSN: 1875-7855
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/
Source: Manual
Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries.
Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.
Journal: Progress in brain research
Volume: 232
Pages: 207-216
eISSN: 1875-7855
ISSN: 0079-6123
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005
Abstract:Hardy et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large-scale, multisource, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of super-elite (SE) and a group of elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Elite Performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative Approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries
Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.
Editors: Wilson, M., Walsh, V. and Parkin, B.
Pages: 207-216
Publisher: Progress in Brain Research 232
ISSN: 1875-7855
Abstract:Hardy, Barlow, Evans et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large scale, multi- source, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of Super-Elite (SE) and a group of Elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper, and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient conditions for elite performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/
Source: BURO EPrints