Reflections on a failed action learning intervention

Authors: Oliver, J.

Journal: Action Learning: Research and Practice

Volume: 5

Pages: 79-83

ISSN: 1476-7333

DOI: 10.1080/14767330701880275

Abstract:

This paper reflects on the failure of a recent action learning intervention with a UK television company. The aim of the project was to gain insight into the reasons why the viewing figures of their factual programming channels were in decline and to develop a new strategy enabled by the action learning methodology. Unfortunately, this intervention was not successful and resulted in the project being cancelled after only one set meeting. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the reasons for this failure and to share my thoughts with others in the action learning community. The paper concludes that the reasons for this failed intervention were due to; my presence being considered by some set members as a threat to their credibility; a resistance to engage in the process of assumption breaking and reflective practice; and due to the perceived time it takes to apply the action learning methodology.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/4901/

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content?content=10.1080/14767330701880275

Source: Manual

Preferred by: John Oliver

Reflections on a failed action learning intervention

Authors: Oliver, J.J.

Journal: Action Learning: Research and Practice

Volume: 5

Issue: 1

Pages: 79-83

ISSN: 1476-7333

Abstract:

This paper reflects on the failure of a recent action learning intervention with a UK television company. The aim of the project was to gain insight into the reasons why the viewing figures of their factual programming channels were in decline and to develop a new strategy enabled by the action learning methodology. Unfortunately, this intervention was not successful and resulted in the project being cancelled after only one set meeting. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the reasons for this failure and to share my thoughts with others in the action learning community. The paper concludes that the reasons for this failed intervention were due to; my presence being considered by some set members as a threat to their credibility; a resistance to engage in the process of assumption breaking and reflective practice; and due to the perceived time it takes to apply the action learning methodology.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/4901/

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content?content=10.1080/14767330701880275

Source: BURO EPrints