India: A spectacle of mismanagement
Authors: Sreedharan, C.
Pages: 123-131
ISBN: 9780367636838
DOI: 10.4324/9781003120254-12
Abstract:The first COVID-19 case in India was reported on January 30, in the southern state of Kerala. Though the state’s response was admirably swift, it was not long before the pandemic spread in other parts of the nation. As of September, India has 4.2 million infections, more than 71,500 deaths, and is the second most-affected nation in the world - this, despite its government imposing the harshest lockdown in the world. This chapter scrutinises the timeline of India’s national response and its crisis communication. Not only did the government misjudge the threat level, but it also failed to utilise the time it bought by placing its 1.3 billion people under severe restrictions. Its communicative responses were delayed, and, while manifestly in line with the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) principles, largely aimed at framing the government’s ad hoc approach to lockdown and exit as effective crisis management that has ‘saved lakhs of lives.'.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34786/
Source: Scopus
India: A Spectacle of Mismanagement
Authors: Sreedharan, C.
Editors: Lilleker, D., Coman, I.A., Gregor, M. and Novelli, E.
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 9780367636791
Abstract:The first COVID-19 case in India was reported on January 30, in the southern state of Kerala. Though the state’s response was admirably swift, it was not long before the pandemic spread in other parts of the nation. As of September, India has 4.2 million infections, more than 71,500 deaths, and is the second most-affected nation in the world—this, despite its government imposing the harshest lockdown in the world. This chapter scrutinises the timeline of India’s national response and its crisis communication. Not only did the government misjudge the threat level, it failed to utilise the time it bought by placing its 1.3 billion people under severe restrictions. Its communicative responses were delayed, and, while manifestly in line with the CERC principles, largely aimed at framing the government’s ad hoc approach to lockdown and exit as effective crisis management that has “saved lakhs of lives”.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34786/
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Darren Lilleker
India: A Spectacle of Mismanagement
Authors: Sreedharan, C.
Editors: Lilleker, D., Coman, I.A., Gregor, M. and Novelli, E.
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 9780367636838
Abstract:The first COVID-19 case in India was reported on January 30, in the southern state of Kerala. Though the state’s response was admirably swift, it was not long before the pandemic spread in other parts of the nation. As of September, India has 4.2 million infections, more than 71,500 deaths, and is the second most-affected nation in the world—this, despite its government imposing the harshest lockdown in the world. This chapter scrutinises the timeline of India’s national response and its crisis communication. Not only did the government misjudge the threat level, it failed to utilise the time it bought by placing its 1.3 billion people under severe restrictions. Its communicative responses were delayed, and, while manifestly in line with the CERC principles, largely aimed at framing the government’s ad hoc approach to lockdown and exit as effective crisis management that has “saved lakhs of lives”.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34786/
Source: Manual
India: A Spectacle of Mismanagement
Authors: Sreedharan, C.
Editors: Lilleker, D., Coman, I.A., Gregor, M. and Novelli, E.
Pages: 123-131
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 9780367636791
Abstract:The first COVID-19 case in India was reported on January 30, in the southern state of Kerala. Though the state’s response was admirably swift, it was not long before the pandemic spread in other parts of the nation. As of September, India has 4.2 million infections, more than 71,500 deaths, and is the second most-affected nation in the world—this, despite its government imposing the harshest lockdown in the world. This chapter scrutinises the timeline of India’s national response and its crisis communication. Not only did the government misjudge the threat level, it failed to utilise the time it bought by placing its 1.3 billion people under severe restrictions. Its communicative responses were delayed, and, while manifestly in line with the CERC principles, largely aimed at framing the government’s ad hoc approach to lockdown and exit as effective crisis management that has “saved lakhs of lives”.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/34786/
Source: BURO EPrints