Humans Terminate Their Haptic Explorations According to an Interplay of Task Demands and Motor Effort

Authors: Jeschke, M., Metzger, A. and Drewing, K.

Journal: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volume: 14768 LNCS

Pages: 82-93

eISSN: 1611-3349

ISSN: 0302-9743

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-70058-3_7

Abstract:

Haptic exploration is an inherently active process by which humans gather sensory information through physical contact with objects. It has been proposed that humans generally optimize their exploration behavior to improve perception. We hypothesized that the duration of haptic explorations is the result of an optimal interplay of sensory and predictive processes, also taking costs such as motor effort into account. We assessed exploration duration and task performance in a two-alternative forced-choice spatial frequency discrimination task under varying conditions of task demand and motor effort. We manipulated task demands by varying the discriminability of virtual grating stimuli and manipulated motor effort by implementing forces counteracting the participants’ movements while switching between stimuli. Participants were instructed to switch between stimuli after each swipe movement. Results revealed that higher task demands lead to higher numbers of exploratory movements (i.e. longer exploration duration), likely reflecting a compensatory mechanism that enables participants to attain a certain level of task performance. However, this effect is reduced when motor effort is increased; while low and medium task demands yield similar numbers of movements regardless of related motor effort, higher demands are not associated with increased numbers of movements when the required motor effort is high. In conclusion, the extent to which increased task demands are compensated via the extension of an exploration seems to depend on the motor costs that the agent is confronted with.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40623/

Source: Scopus

Humans Terminate Their Haptic Explorations According to an Interplay of Task Demands and Motor Effort

Authors: Jeschke, M., Metzger, A. and Drewing, K.

Editors: Kajimoto, H., Lopes, P., Pacchierotti, C., Basdogan, C., Gori, M., Lemaire-Semail, B. and Marchal, M.

Volume: 14768

Pages: 82-93

Publisher: Springer

Place of Publication: Cham

ISBN: 9783031700576

ISSN: 0302-9743

Abstract:

Haptic exploration is an inherently active process by which humans gather sensory information through physical contact with objects. It has been proposed that humans generally optimize their exploration behavior to improve perception. We hypothesized that the duration of haptic explorations is the result of an optimal interplay of sensory and predictive processes, also taking costs such as motor effort into account. We assessed exploration duration and task performance in a two-alternative forced-choice spatial frequency discrimination task under varying conditions of task demand and motor effort. We manipulated task demands by varying the discriminability of virtual grating stimuli and manipulated motor effort by implementing forces counteracting the participants’ movements while switching between stimuli. Participants were instructed to switch between stimuli after each swipe movement. Results revealed that higher task demands lead to higher numbers of exploratory movements (i.e. longer exploration duration), likely reflecting a compensatory mechanism that enables participants to attain a certain level of task performance. However, this effect is reduced when motor effort is increased; while low and medium task demands yield similar numbers of movements regardless of related motor effort, higher demands are not associated with increased numbers of movements when the required motor effort is high. In conclusion, the extent to which increased task demands are compensated via the extension of an exploration seems to depend on the motor costs that the agent is confronted with.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40623/

Source: BURO EPrints