On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?
Authors: Rayner, K., Angele, B., Schotter, E.R. and Bicknell, K.
Journal: Visual Cognition
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: 353-381
eISSN: 1464-0716
ISSN: 1350-6285
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.791739
Abstract:Whether readers always identify words in the order they are printed is subject to considerable debate. In the present study, we used the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to manipulate the preview for a two-word target region (e.g., white walls in My neighbor painted the white walls black). Readers received an identical (white walls), transposed (walls white), or unrelated preview (vodka clubs). We found that there was a clear cost of having a transposed preview compared to an identical preview, indicating that readers cannot or do not identify words out of order. However, on some measures, the transposed preview condition did lead to faster processing than the unrelated preview condition, suggesting that readers may be able to obtain some useful information from a transposed preview. Implications of the results for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39483/
Source: Scopus
On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?
Authors: Rayner, K., Angele, B., Schotter, E.R. and Bicknell, K.
Journal: Vis cogn
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: 353-381
ISSN: 1350-6285
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.791739
Abstract:Whether readers always identify words in the order they are printed is subject to considerable debate. In the present study, we used the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to manipulate the preview for a two-word target region (e.g. white walls in My neighbor painted the white walls black). Readers received an identical (white walls), transposed (walls white), or unrelated preview (vodka clubs). We found that there was a clear cost of having a transposed preview compared to an identical preview, indicating that readers cannot or do not identify words out of order. However, on some measures, the transposed preview condition did lead to faster processing than the unrelated preview condition, suggesting that readers may be able to obtain some useful information from a transposed preview. Implications of the results for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39483/
Source: PubMed
On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?
Authors: Rayner, K., Angele, B., Schotter, E.R. and Bicknell, K.
Journal: VISUAL COGNITION
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: 353-381
eISSN: 1464-0716
ISSN: 1350-6285
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.791739
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39483/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Preferred by: Bernhard Angele
On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?
Authors: Rayner, K., Angele, B., Schotter, E.R. and Bicknell, K.
Journal: Visual cognition
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: 353-381
ISSN: 1350-6285
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.791739
Abstract:Whether readers always identify words in the order they are printed is subject to considerable debate. In the present study, we used the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to manipulate the preview for a two-word target region (e.g. white walls in My neighbor painted the white walls black). Readers received an identical (white walls), transposed (walls white), or unrelated preview (vodka clubs). We found that there was a clear cost of having a transposed preview compared to an identical preview, indicating that readers cannot or do not identify words out of order. However, on some measures, the transposed preview condition did lead to faster processing than the unrelated preview condition, suggesting that readers may be able to obtain some useful information from a transposed preview. Implications of the results for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39483/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?
Authors: Rayner, K., Angele, B., Schotter, E.R. and Bicknell, K.
Journal: Visual Cognition
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: 353-381
ISSN: 1350-6285
Abstract:Whether readers always identify words in the order they are printed is subject to considerable debate. In the present study, we used the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to manipulate the preview for a two-word target region (e.g., white walls in My neighbor painted the white walls black). Readers received an identical (white walls), transposed (walls white), or unrelated preview (vodka clubs). We found that there was a clear cost of having a transposed preview compared to an identical preview, indicating that readers cannot or do not identify words out of order. However, on some measures, the transposed preview condition did lead to faster processing than the unrelated preview condition, suggesting that readers may be able to obtain some useful information from a transposed preview. Implications of the results for models of eye movement control in reading are discussed. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/39483/
Source: BURO EPrints