CSR and new battle lines in online PR war: A case study of the energy sector and its discontents
Authors: McQueen, D.
Journal: Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility
Volume: 7
Pages: 99-125
eISSN: 2043-0531
ISSN: 2043-0523
DOI: 10.1108/S2043-052320150000007008
Abstract:Purpose - The focus of the chapter is on disputes around corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the fossil fuel industry and how media and social networking technologies are deployed in a virtual war between oil corporations and dissident, activist and protest groups. Methodology/approach - Communications by BP, Shell, and their opponents in this virtual war are compared, especially in relation to the creative use of the internet, digital technologies, and social media. Through a case study approach, the chapter shows how communications often center on contested notions of CSR and claims by the oil giants about their environmental impact, which opponents dismiss as "greenwashing." The various techniques deployed by both sides in this wideranging "PR war" are explored and contrasted in detail. Findings - The findings for each case study reveal the diverse, complex, and changing nature of the relationship between the oil industry and its critics. The chapter concludes by arguing that if CSR is seen as "greenwashing" by the public, it is only likely to fuel widespread skepticism of the oil and gas sector and of corporate claims about the environment more generally. Research limitations/implications - The research offers a snapshot of online and social media campaigns and PR strategies and tactics within the oil and gas industry rather than empirically grounded set of findings that can be easily applied to other fields. Practical implications - Practical implications include attention to inflated or understated claims and the use of citizen testimony and humor to puncture CSR "rhetoric." There is consideration of use of digital technologies by activists and attention to the way public debates and consultations are conducted. The need for a more respectful engagement with local communities by all parties engaging in public relations is underlined. Originality/value - The chapter applies the concept of "asymmetrical warfare" from conflict studies within the media and communications tradition to provide a fresh revaluation of the term "PR war," It offers a rare focus on online efforts by activist to subvert CSR-related branding, marketing, and communications. Discussion of the use of parody alongside factual and emotional arguments to challenge corporate hegemony also provides revealing insights.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30495/
Source: Scopus
CSR and new battle lines in online PR war: a case study of the energy sector and its discontents
Authors: McQueen, D.
Editors: Adi, A., Grigore, G. and Crowther, D.
Volume: 7
Pages: 99-125
Publisher: Emerald
Abstract:The focus of the chapter is on disputes around corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the fossil fuel industry and how media and social networking technologies are deployed in a virtual war between oil corporations and dissident, activist and protest groups. The paper explores the PR record of two energy companies, BP and Shell, alongside public communications by various opponents including Greenpeace. It shows how a range of online messages play an increasingly important part in a wider ‘PR war’ designed to influence public opinion and government policy. This PR war often centres on contested notions of CSR and claims by the oil giants about their environmental impact, which opponents dismiss as ‘greenwashing’. BP’s CSR and reputation management is critically examined in relation to the Deepwater Horizon disaster of 2010, the subsequent public relations debacle and online campaigns by activists targeting the company’s brand and CSR credentials. Shell’s more recent CSR-related communications around oil exploration in the Arctic are also contrasted with Greenpeace’s ‘brandjacking’ and social networking campaigns designed to discredit Shell’s claims to being environmentally responsible. Finally, the chapter will turn to the less well-known public relations war between Shell and protestors over the Corrib gas pipeline and reprocessing plant in County Mayo, Ireland and the rapidly-evolving and sophisticated PR strategies deployed by both sides of the dispute. Communications by BP, Shell and their opponents in this far-reaching ‘PR war’ are compared including creative use of the internet, digital technologies and social media. For opponents of the fossil fuel industry this has enabled the linking of disparate communities and activists around the world. The chapter touches on the wide scope of protest methods used by campaigning groups but focuses on online campaigns, including the use of social media, the development of parody sites and low- or no-budget video which has allowed opponents of the oil industry to reach new audiences. However, such efforts have not gone unanswered and responses by Shell Oil, in particular, show how the public relations war has had uneven outcomes with no outright ‘victor’ emerging.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30495/
Source: BURO EPrints