Decision making with respect to diagnostic testing: A method of valuing the benefits of antenatal screening
Authors: Cairns, J., Shackley, P. and Hundley, V.
Journal: Medical Decision Making
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 161-168
ISSN: 0272-989X
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600208
Abstract:This paper outlines a model for valuing the benefits of antenatal screening based on the analysis of individual decision making with respect to consequent diagnostic testing. Central to the model is the idea that the benefits of screening can be measured by valuing the improved information generated from screening. The model is developed in the context of antenatal carder screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). Benefits are assessed by surveying women in the general population in order to establish their preferences for two alternative methods of CF carder screening-stepwise and couple screening. Preferences are elicited using standard-gamble questions in which women from a population-based random sample are asked to trade off risk of fetal loss with improved information from diagnostic testing. A series of standard- gamble questions is employed to elicit utility values for each of the possible information outcomes from screening. The expected utilities of both screening methods are calculated at both individual and group levels. The results suggest that the use of individual decision making with respect to diagnostic testing as a means of valuing the benefits of screening may have wide applications.
Source: Scopus
Decision making with respect to diagnostic testing: a method of valuing the benefits of antenatal screening.
Authors: Cairns, J., Shackley, P. and Hundley, V.
Journal: Med Decis Making
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 161-168
ISSN: 0272-989X
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600208
Abstract:This paper outlines a model for valuing the benefits of antenatal screening based on the analysis of individual decision making with respect to consequent diagnostic testing. Central to the model is the idea that the benefits of screening can be measured by valuing the improved information generated from screening. The model is developed in the context of antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). Benefits are assessed by surveying women in the general population in order to establish their preferences for two alternative methods of CF carrier screening-stepwise and couple screening. Preferences are elicited using standard-gamble questions in which women from a population-based random sample are asked to trade off risk of fetal loss with improved information from diagnostic testing. A series of standard-gamble questions is employed to elicit utility values for each of the possible information outcomes from screening. The expected utilities of both screening methods are calculated at both individual and group levels. The results suggest that the use of individual decision making with respect to diagnostic testing as a means of valuing the benefits of screening may have wide applications.
Source: PubMed
Decision making with respect to diagnostic testing: A method of valuing the benefits of antenatal screening
Authors: Cairns, J., Shackley, P. and Hundley, V.
Journal: MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 161-168
ISSN: 0272-989X
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600208
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Decision making with respect to diagnostic testing: a method of valuing the benefits of antenatal screening.
Authors: Cairns, J., Shackley, P. and Hundley, V.
Journal: Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 161-168
eISSN: 1552-681X
ISSN: 0272-989X
DOI: 10.1177/0272989x9601600208
Abstract:This paper outlines a model for valuing the benefits of antenatal screening based on the analysis of individual decision making with respect to consequent diagnostic testing. Central to the model is the idea that the benefits of screening can be measured by valuing the improved information generated from screening. The model is developed in the context of antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). Benefits are assessed by surveying women in the general population in order to establish their preferences for two alternative methods of CF carrier screening-stepwise and couple screening. Preferences are elicited using standard-gamble questions in which women from a population-based random sample are asked to trade off risk of fetal loss with improved information from diagnostic testing. A series of standard-gamble questions is employed to elicit utility values for each of the possible information outcomes from screening. The expected utilities of both screening methods are calculated at both individual and group levels. The results suggest that the use of individual decision making with respect to diagnostic testing as a means of valuing the benefits of screening may have wide applications.
Source: Europe PubMed Central