Decision making with respect to diagnostic testing: A method of valuing the benefits of antenatal screening

This data was imported from PubMed:

Authors: Cairns, J., Shackley, P. and Hundley, V.

Journal: Med Decis Making

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 161-168

ISSN: 0272-989X

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600208

This paper outlines a model for valuing the benefits of antenatal screening based on the analysis of individual decision making with respect to consequent diagnostic testing. Central to the model is the idea that the benefits of screening can be measured by valuing the improved information generated from screening. The model is developed in the context of antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). Benefits are assessed by surveying women in the general population in order to establish their preferences for two alternative methods of CF carrier screening-stepwise and couple screening. Preferences are elicited using standard-gamble questions in which women from a population-based random sample are asked to trade off risk of fetal loss with improved information from diagnostic testing. A series of standard-gamble questions is employed to elicit utility values for each of the possible information outcomes from screening. The expected utilities of both screening methods are calculated at both individual and group levels. The results suggest that the use of individual decision making with respect to diagnostic testing as a means of valuing the benefits of screening may have wide applications.

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Cairns, J., Shackley, P. and Hundley, V.

Journal: Medical Decision Making

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 161-168

ISSN: 0272-989X

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600208

This paper outlines a model for valuing the benefits of antenatal screening based on the analysis of individual decision making with respect to consequent diagnostic testing. Central to the model is the idea that the benefits of screening can be measured by valuing the improved information generated from screening. The model is developed in the context of antenatal carder screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). Benefits are assessed by surveying women in the general population in order to establish their preferences for two alternative methods of CF carder screening-stepwise and couple screening. Preferences are elicited using standard-gamble questions in which women from a population-based random sample are asked to trade off risk of fetal loss with improved information from diagnostic testing. A series of standard- gamble questions is employed to elicit utility values for each of the possible information outcomes from screening. The expected utilities of both screening methods are calculated at both individual and group levels. The results suggest that the use of individual decision making with respect to diagnostic testing as a means of valuing the benefits of screening may have wide applications.

This data was imported from Web of Science (Lite):

Authors: Cairns, J., Shackley, P. and Hundley, V.

Journal: MEDICAL DECISION MAKING

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 161-168

ISSN: 0272-989X

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9601600208

The data on this page was last updated at 05:17 on April 2, 2020.