Intertidal invertebrate harvesting: A meta-analysis of impacts and recovery in an important waterbird prey resource
Authors: Clarke, L.J., Hughes, K.M., Esteves, L.S., Herbert, R.J.H. and Stillman, R.A.
Journal: Marine Ecology Progress Series
Volume: 584
Pages: 229-244
ISSN: 0171-8630
DOI: 10.3354/meps12349
Abstract:Harvesting of marine invertebrates in intertidal areas often comes into conflict with conservation objectives for waterbird populations of the orders Anseriformes and Charadriiformes. We present a meta-analysis of the relationships between benthic invertebrate communities and various sources of intertidal harvesting disturbance to investigate impacts and recovery in bird prey resources. The effect size (Hedges' d) of harvesting on benthic species abundance, diversity and biomass was calculated for 38 studies in various locations globally, derived from 16 publications captured through a systematic review process that met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria. A negative response to harvesting disturbance was found for all taxa, including both target and non-target species, that represent important types of waterbird prey. Impacts appear most severe from hand-gathering, which significantly reduces the abundance of target polychaete species, a key prey group for many bird species. Across all gear types, non-target species demonstrate a larger reduction in abundance compared to target species. Recovery trends vary, with differences observed between taxonomic groups and gear/habitat combinations. Abundance of bivalve molluscs, a potentially highly profitable bird prey item, is suppressed for >60 d by mechanical dredging in intertidal mud, while annelid and crustacean abundances demonstrate near recovery over the same period. Data suggest that recovery following harvesting in sandier habitats may in some cases take as long as or longer than in muddy sediments. We recommend management measures to minimise disturbance to benthic prey resources and support conservation objectives for waterbird populations to meet international legal requirements.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30104/
Source: Scopus
Intertidal invertebrate harvesting: a meta-analysis of impacts and recovery in an important waterbird prey resource
Authors: Clarke, L.J., Hughes, K.M., Esteves, L.S., Herbert, R.J.H. and Stillman, R.A.
Journal: MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume: 584
Pages: 229-244
eISSN: 1616-1599
ISSN: 0171-8630
DOI: 10.3354/meps12349
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30104/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Intertidal invertebrate harvesting: a meta-analysis of impacts and recovery in an important waterbird prey resource
Authors: Clarke, L., Hughes, K., Esteves, L., Herbert, R. and Stillman, R.
Journal: Marine Ecology Progress Series
Volume: 584
Pages: 229-244
Publisher: Inter-Research Science Publishing
ISSN: 0171-8630
Abstract:Harvesting of marine invertebrates in intertidal areas often comes into conflict with conservation objectives for waterbird populations of the orders Anseriformes and Charadriiformes.
We present a meta-analysis of the relationships between benthic invertebrate communities and various sources of intertidal harvesting disturbance to investigate impacts and recovery in bird prey resources. The effect size (Hedges’ d) of harvesting on benthic species abundance, diversity and biomass was calculated for 38 studies in various locations globally, derived from 16 publications captured through a systematic review process that met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria. A negative response to harvesting disturbance was found for all taxa, including both target and non-target species, that represent important types of waterbird prey. Impacts appear most severe from hand-gathering, which significantly reduces the abundance of target polychaete species, a key prey group for many bird species. Across all gear types, non-target species demonstrate a larger reduction in abundance compared to target species. Recovery trends vary, with differences observed between taxonomic groups and gear/habitat combinations. Abundance of bivalve molluscs, a potentially highly profitable bird prey item, is suppressed for >60 d by mechanical dredging in intertidal mud, while annelid and crustacean abundances demonstrate near recovery over the same period. Data suggest that recovery following harvesting in sandier habitats may in some cases take as long as or longer than in muddy sediments. We recommend management measures to minimise disturbance to benthic prey resources and support conservation objectives for waterbird populations to meet international legal requirements.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30104/
Source: Manual
Intertidal invertebrate harvesting: a meta-analysis of impacts and recovery in an important waterbird prey resource
Authors: Clarke, L., Hughes, K., Esteves, L.S., Herbert, R.J.H. and Stillman, R.A.
Journal: Marine Ecology Progress Series
Volume: 584
Pages: 229-244
ISSN: 0171-8630
Abstract:Harvesting of marine invertebrates in intertidal areas often comes into conflict with conservation objectives for waterbird populations of the orders Anseriformes and Charadriiformes. We present a meta-analysis of the relationships between benthic invertebrate communities and various sources of intertidal harvesting disturbance to investigate impacts and recovery in bird prey resources. The effect size (Hedges’ d) of harvesting on benthic species abundance, diversity and biomass was calculated for 38 studies in various locations globally, derived from 16 publications captured through a systematic review process that met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria. A negative response to harvesting disturbance was found for all taxa, including both target and non-target species, that represent important types of waterbird prey. Impacts appear most severe from hand-gathering, which significantly reduces the abundance of target polychaete species, a key prey group for many bird species. Across all gear types, non-target species demonstrate a larger reduction in abundance compared to target species. Recovery trends vary, with differences observed between taxonomic groups and gear/habitat combinations. Abundance of bivalve molluscs, a potentially highly profitable bird prey item, is suppressed for >60 d by mechanical dredging in intertidal mud, while annelid and crustacean abundances demonstrate near recovery over the same period. Data suggest that recovery following harvesting in sandier habitats may in some cases take as long as or longer than in muddy sediments. We recommend management measures to minimise disturbance to benthic prey resources and support conservation objectives for waterbird populations to meet international legal requirements.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30104/
Source: BURO EPrints