Knee manipulation for reduced flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Is timing critical?
Authors: Pagoti, R., O'Brien, S., Blaney, J., Doran, E. and Beverland, D.
Journal: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Volume: 9
Issue: 4
Pages: 295-299
eISSN: 2213-3445
ISSN: 0976-5662
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.017
Abstract:Background: Reduced flexion following knee arthroplasty (TKA) may compromise patient's function and outcome. The timing of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) has been controversial. We present our experience in a high volume practice and analyse the impact of timing. Methods: All TKA patients requiring MUA from February 1996 to June 2015 under the care of a single surgeon were analysed. MUA was offered to patients who had ≤ 75° of flexion post-op, providing that they had 30° more flexion preoperatively. To address the impact of timing from primary surgery to MUA on flexion gain we looked at 3 groups: Group I ≤ 90 days, Group II 91-180 days and Group III > 180 days. Results: Sixty two out of 7,423 (0.84%) underwent MUA. The MUA patients were significantly younger than the overall TKA cohort 61.2 vs 70.5 years (p = < 0.01). The median duration between arthroplasty and MUA was 3.9 months (IQR 3.4, Range 1.6-72.5 months). Overall flexion gained at 6-12 Weeks and 1 year post MUA showed significant improvements of 20.9° (p = <0.01) and 25° respectively (p = < 0.01). The flexion gain in group I (≤ 90 days) was significantly better than group III (> 180 days) both at 6 weeks and 1 year following MUA but not better than group II (90-180 days). Conclusions: MUA is an effective treatment for reduced flexion following TKA and should be the first line of management after failed physiotherapy. It can still have benefit beyond 6 months but the gains become less effective with time.
Source: Scopus
Knee manipulation for reduced flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Is timing critical?
Authors: Pagoti, R., O'Brien, S., Blaney, J., Doran, E. and Beverland, D.
Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Volume: 9
Issue: 4
Pages: 295-299
ISSN: 0976-5662
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.017
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Reduced flexion following knee arthroplasty (TKA) may compromise patient's function and outcome. The timing of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) has been controversial. We present our experience in a high volume practice and analyse the impact of timing. METHODS: All TKA patients requiring MUA from February 1996 to June 2015 under the care of a single surgeon were analysed. MUA was offered to patients who had ≤ 75° of flexion post-op, providing that they had 30° more flexion preoperatively. To address the impact of timing from primary surgery to MUA on flexion gain we looked at 3 groups: Group I ≤ 90 days, Group II 91-180 days and Group III > 180 days. RESULTS: Sixty two out of 7,423 (0.84%) underwent MUA. The MUA patients were significantly younger than the overall TKA cohort 61.2 vs 70.5 years (p = < 0.01). The median duration between arthroplasty and MUA was 3.9 months (IQR 3.4, Range 1.6-72.5 months). Overall flexion gained at 6-12 Weeks and 1 year post MUA showed significant improvements of 20.9° (p = <0.01) and 25° respectively (p = < 0.01). The flexion gain in group I (≤ 90 days) was significantly better than group III ( > 180 days) both at 6 weeks and 1 year following MUA but not better than group II (90-180 days). CONCLUSIONS: MUA is an effective treatment for reduced flexion following TKA and should be the first line of management after failed physiotherapy. It can still have benefit beyond 6 months but the gains become less effective with time.
Source: PubMed
Knee manipulation for reduced flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Is timing critical?
Authors: Pagoti, R., O'Brien, S., Blaney, J., Doran, E. and Beverland, D.
Journal: Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
Volume: 9
Issue: 4
Pages: 295-299
eISSN: 2213-3445
ISSN: 0976-5662
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.017
Abstract:Background
Reduced flexion following knee arthroplasty (TKA) may compromise patient's function and outcome. The timing of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) has been controversial. We present our experience in a high volume practice and analyse the impact of timing.Methods
All TKA patients requiring MUA from February 1996 to June 2015 under the care of a single surgeon were analysed. MUA was offered to patients who had ≤ 75° of flexion post-op, providing that they had 30° more flexion preoperatively. To address the impact of timing from primary surgery to MUA on flexion gain we looked at 3 groups: Group I ≤ 90 days, Group II 91-180 days and Group III > 180 days.Results
Sixty two out of 7,423 (0.84%) underwent MUA. The MUA patients were significantly younger than the overall TKA cohort 61.2 vs 70.5 years (p = < 0.01). The median duration between arthroplasty and MUA was 3.9 months (IQR 3.4, Range 1.6-72.5 months). Overall flexion gained at 6-12 Weeks and 1 year post MUA showed significant improvements of 20.9° (p = <0.01) and 25° respectively (p = < 0.01). The flexion gain in group I (≤ 90 days) was significantly better than group III ( > 180 days) both at 6 weeks and 1 year following MUA but not better than group II (90-180 days).Conclusions
MUA is an effective treatment for reduced flexion following TKA and should be the first line of management after failed physiotherapy. It can still have benefit beyond 6 months but the gains become less effective with time.Source: Europe PubMed Central