The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C
Authors: Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al.
Journal: Science
Volume: 365
Issue: 6459
eISSN: 1095-9203
ISSN: 0036-8075
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw6974
Abstract:Increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases have led to a global mean surface temperature 1.0°C higher than during the pre-industrial period. We expand on the recent IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C and review the additional risks associated with higher levels of warming, each having major implications for multiple geographies, climates, and ecosystems. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2.0°C would be required to maintain substantial proportions of ecosystems and would have clear benefits for human health and economies. These conclusions are relevant for people everywhere, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where the escalation of climate-related risks may prevent the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32695/
Source: Scopus
The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C.
Authors: Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al.
Journal: Science
Volume: 365
Issue: 6459
eISSN: 1095-9203
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw6974
Abstract:Increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases have led to a global mean surface temperature 1.0°C higher than during the pre-industrial period. We expand on the recent IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C and review the additional risks associated with higher levels of warming, each having major implications for multiple geographies, climates, and ecosystems. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2.0°C would be required to maintain substantial proportions of ecosystems and would have clear benefits for human health and economies. These conclusions are relevant for people everywhere, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where the escalation of climate-related risks may prevent the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32695/
Source: PubMed
The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C
Authors: Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al.
Journal: SCIENCE
Volume: 365
Issue: 6459
Pages: 1263-+
eISSN: 1095-9203
ISSN: 0036-8075
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw6974
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32695/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C
Authors: Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al.
Journal: Science
Abstract:Global mean surface temperature is now 1.0°C higher than the pre-industrial period due to increasing atmospheric greenhouse gases. Significant changes to natural and human (managed) systems have already occurred emphasizing serious near-term risks. Here, we expand on the recent IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C as well as additional risks associated with dangerous and irreversible states at higher levels of warming, each having major implications for multiple geographies, climates and ecosystems. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2.0°C is very beneficial, maintaining significant proportions of systems such as Arctic summer sea ice, forests and coral reefs as well as having clear benefits for human health and economies. These conclusions are relevant for people everywhere, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where climate related risks to livelihoods, health, food, water, and economic growth are escalating with major implications for the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32695/
Source: Manual
The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C.
Authors: Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al.
Journal: Science (New York, N.Y.)
Volume: 365
Issue: 6459
Pages: eaaw6974
eISSN: 1095-9203
ISSN: 0036-8075
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw6974
Abstract:Increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases have led to a global mean surface temperature 1.0°C higher than during the pre-industrial period. We expand on the recent IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C and review the additional risks associated with higher levels of warming, each having major implications for multiple geographies, climates, and ecosystems. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2.0°C would be required to maintain substantial proportions of ecosystems and would have clear benefits for human health and economies. These conclusions are relevant for people everywhere, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where the escalation of climate-related risks may prevent the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32695/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C
Authors: Brown, S. et al.
Journal: Science
Volume: 365
Issue: 6459
ISSN: 0036-8075
Abstract:Global mean surface temperature is now 1.0°C higher than the pre-industrial period due to increasing atmospheric greenhouse gases. Significant changes to natural and human (managed) systems have already occurred emphasizing serious near-term risks. Here, we expand on the recent IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C as well as additional risks associated with dangerous and irreversible states at higher levels of warming, each having major implications for multiple geographies, climates and ecosystems. Limiting warming to 1.5°C rather than 2.0°C is very beneficial, maintaining significant proportions of systems such as Arctic summer sea ice, forests and coral reefs as well as having clear benefits for human health and economies. These conclusions are relevant for people everywhere, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where climate related risks to livelihoods, health, food, water, and economic growth are escalating with major implications for the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32695/
Source: BURO EPrints