Research activity and evidence-based practice within DNA: a survey.
Authors: Ersser, S.J., Plauntz, L., Sibley, A.
Journal: Dermatology Nursing Dermatology Nurses Association
Publication Date: 01/06/2008
Volume: 20
Issue: 3
Pages: 189-194
ISSN: 1060-3441
Abstract:In this survey, research awareness and capacity within the Dermatology Nurses' Association (DNA) was investigated to inform the organization's development in both the use of research evidence to improve practice and the capacity to undertake research. The majority of respondents (almost 90%) indicated they were DNA members. Of the remaining respondents who did not answer this question, we could not be clear on their status and so decided not to separate member and non-member responses during analysis.
Source: Scopus
Research activity and evidence-based practice within DNA: a survey.
Authors: Ersser, S.J., Plauntz, L., Sibley, A.
Journal: Dermatol Nurs
Publication Date: 06/2008
Volume: 20
Issue: 3
Pages: 189-194
ISSN: 1060-3441
Abstract:In this survey, research awareness and capacity within the Dermatology Nurses' Association (DNA) was investigated to inform the organization's development in both the use of research evidence to improve practice and the capacity to undertake research. The majority of respondents (almost 90%) indicated they were DNA members. Of the remaining respondents who did not answer this question, we could not be clear on their status and so decided not to separate member and non-member responses during analysis.
Source: PubMed
Research activity and evidence-based practice within DNA: a survey.
Authors: Ersser, S.J., Plauntz, L., Sibley, A.
Journal: Dermatology nursing
Publication Date: 06/2008
Volume: 20
Issue: 3
Pages: 189-194
ISSN: 1060-3441
Abstract:In this survey, research awareness and capacity within the Dermatology Nurses' Association (DNA) was investigated to inform the organization's development in both the use of research evidence to improve practice and the capacity to undertake research. The majority of respondents (almost 90%) indicated they were DNA members. Of the remaining respondents who did not answer this question, we could not be clear on their status and so decided not to separate member and non-member responses during analysis.
Source: Europe PubMed Central