Response Modality and the Stroop Task: Are There Phonological Stroop Effects with Manual Responses?
Authors: Parris, B.A., Sharma, D., Weekes, B.S.H., Momenian, M., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Experimental Psychology
Volume: 66
Issue: 5
Pages: 361-367
eISSN: 2190-5142
ISSN: 1618-3169
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000459
Abstract:A long-standing debate in the Stroop literature concerns whether the way we respond to the color dimension determines how we process the irrelevant dimension, or whether word processing is purely stimulus driven. Models and findings in the Stroop literature differ in their predictions about how response modes (e.g., responding manually vs. vocally) affect how the irrelevant word is processed (i.e., phonologically, semantically) and the interference and facilitation that results, with some predicting qualitatively different Stroop effects. Here, we investigated whether response mode modifies phonological facilitation produced by the irrelevant word. In a fully within-subject design, we sought evidence for the use of a serial print-to-speech prelexical phonological processing route when using manual and vocal responses by testing for facilitating effects of phonological overlap between the irrelevant word and the color name at the initial and final phoneme positions. The results showed phoneme overlap leads to facilitation with both response modes, a result that is inconsistent with qualitative differences between the two response modes.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32973/
Source: Scopus
Response Modality and the Stroop Task.
Authors: Parris, B.A., Sharma, D., Weekes, B.S.H., Momenian, M., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Exp Psychol
Volume: 66
Issue: 5
Pages: 361-367
eISSN: 2190-5142
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000459
Abstract:A long-standing debate in the Stroop literature concerns whether the way we respond to the color dimension determines how we process the irrelevant dimension, or whether word processing is purely stimulus driven. Models and findings in the Stroop literature differ in their predictions about how response modes (e.g., responding manually vs. vocally) affect how the irrelevant word is processed (i.e., phonologically, semantically) and the interference and facilitation that results, with some predicting qualitatively different Stroop effects. Here, we investigated whether response mode modifies phonological facilitation produced by the irrelevant word. In a fully within-subject design, we sought evidence for the use of a serial print-to-speech prelexical phonological processing route when using manual and vocal responses by testing for facilitating effects of phonological overlap between the irrelevant word and the color name at the initial and final phoneme positions. The results showed phoneme overlap leads to facilitation with both response modes, a result that is inconsistent with qualitative differences between the two response modes.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32973/
Source: PubMed
Response Modality and the Stroop Task Are There Phonological Stroop Effects With Manual Responses?
Authors: Parris, B.A., Sharma, D., Weekes, B.S.H., Momenian, M., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume: 66
Issue: 5
Pages: 361-367
eISSN: 2190-5142
ISSN: 1618-3169
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000459
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32973/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Response modality and the Stroop task: Are there phonological Stroop effects with a manual response?
Authors: Parris, B.A., Sharma, D., Weekes, B.S., Momenian, M., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Experimental Psychology
Publisher: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers
ISSN: 1618-3169
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32973/
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Ben Parris
Response Modality and the Stroop Task.
Authors: Parris, B.A., Sharma, D., Weekes, B.S.H., Momenian, M., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Experimental psychology
Volume: 66
Issue: 5
Pages: 361-367
eISSN: 2190-5142
ISSN: 1618-3169
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000459
Abstract:A long-standing debate in the Stroop literature concerns whether the way we respond to the color dimension determines how we process the irrelevant dimension, or whether word processing is purely stimulus driven. Models and findings in the Stroop literature differ in their predictions about how response modes (e.g., responding manually vs. vocally) affect how the irrelevant word is processed (i.e., phonologically, semantically) and the interference and facilitation that results, with some predicting qualitatively different Stroop effects. Here, we investigated whether response mode modifies phonological facilitation produced by the irrelevant word. In a fully within-subject design, we sought evidence for the use of a serial print-to-speech prelexical phonological processing route when using manual and vocal responses by testing for facilitating effects of phonological overlap between the irrelevant word and the color name at the initial and final phoneme positions. The results showed phoneme overlap leads to facilitation with both response modes, a result that is inconsistent with qualitative differences between the two response modes.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32973/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Response modality and the Stroop task: Are there phonological Stroop effects with a manual response?
Authors: Parris, B., Sharma, D., Weekes, B.S., Momenian, M., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Experimental Psychology
Volume: 66
Issue: 5
Pages: 361-367
ISSN: 1618-3169
Abstract:A long-standing debate in the Stroop literature concerns whether the way we respond to the color dimension determines how we process the irrelevant dimension, or whether word processing is purely stimulus driven. Models and findings in the Stroop literature differ in their predictions about how response modes (e.g., responding manually vs. vocally) affect how the irrelevant word is processed (i.e., phonologically, semantically) and the interference and facilitation that results, with some predicting qualitatively different Stroop effects. Here, we investigated whether response mode modifies phonological facilitation produced by the irrelevant word. In a fully within-subject design, we sought evidence for the use of a serial print-to-speech prelexical phonological processing route when using manual and vocal responses by testing for facilitating effects of phonological overlap between the irrelevant word and the color name at the initial and final phoneme positions. The results showed phoneme overlap leads to facilitation with both response modes, a result that is inconsistent with qualitative differences between the two response modes.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32973/
Source: BURO EPrints