An fMRI study of response and semantic conflict in the stroop task
Authors: Parris, B.A., Wadsley, M.G., Hasshim, N., Benattayallah, A., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Frontiers in Psychology
Volume: 10
Issue: OCT
eISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426
Abstract:An enduring question in selective attention research is whether we can successfully ignore an irrelevant stimulus and at what point in the stream of processing we are able to select the appropriate source of information. Using methods informed by recent research on the varieties of conflict in the Stroop task the present study provides evidence for specialized functions of regions of the frontoparietal network in processing response and semantic conflict during Stroop task performance. Specifically, we used trial types and orthogonal contrasts thought to better independently measure response and semantic conflict and we presented the trial types in pure blocks to maximize response conflict and therefore better distinguish between the conflict types. Our data indicate that the left inferior PFC plays an important role in the processing of both response and semantic (or stimulus) conflict, whilst regions of the left parietal cortex (BA40) play an accompanying role in response, but not semantic, conflict processing. Moreover, our study reports a role for the right mediodorsal thalamus in processing semantic, but not response, conflict. In none of our comparisons did we observe activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a finding we ascribe to the use of blocked trial type presentation and one that has implications for theories of ACC function.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33112/
Source: Scopus
An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task.
Authors: Parris, B.A., Wadsley, M.G., Hasshim, N., Benattayallah, A., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Front Psychol
Volume: 10
Pages: 2426
ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426
Abstract:An enduring question in selective attention research is whether we can successfully ignore an irrelevant stimulus and at what point in the stream of processing we are able to select the appropriate source of information. Using methods informed by recent research on the varieties of conflict in the Stroop task the present study provides evidence for specialized functions of regions of the frontoparietal network in processing response and semantic conflict during Stroop task performance. Specifically, we used trial types and orthogonal contrasts thought to better independently measure response and semantic conflict and we presented the trial types in pure blocks to maximize response conflict and therefore better distinguish between the conflict types. Our data indicate that the left inferior PFC plays an important role in the processing of both response and semantic (or stimulus) conflict, whilst regions of the left parietal cortex (BA40) play an accompanying role in response, but not semantic, conflict processing. Moreover, our study reports a role for the right mediodorsal thalamus in processing semantic, but not response, conflict. In none of our comparisons did we observe activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a finding we ascribe to the use of blocked trial type presentation and one that has implications for theories of ACC function.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33112/
Source: PubMed
An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
Authors: Parris, B.A., Wadsley, M.G., Hasshim, N., Benattayallah, A., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume: 10
ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33112/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
An fMRI study of response and semantic conflict in the Stroop task
Authors: Parris, B.A., Wadsley, M.G., Hasshim, N., Benatayallah, A., Augustinova, M., Ferrand, L. and Wadsley, M.
Journal: Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher: Frontiers Media
ISSN: 1664-1078
Abstract:Nabil
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33112/
Source: Manual
An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task.
Authors: Parris, B.A., Wadsley, M.G., Hasshim, N., Benattayallah, A., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Frontiers in psychology
Volume: 10
Pages: 2426
eISSN: 1664-1078
ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02426
Abstract:An enduring question in selective attention research is whether we can successfully ignore an irrelevant stimulus and at what point in the stream of processing we are able to select the appropriate source of information. Using methods informed by recent research on the varieties of conflict in the Stroop task the present study provides evidence for specialized functions of regions of the frontoparietal network in processing response and semantic conflict during Stroop task performance. Specifically, we used trial types and orthogonal contrasts thought to better independently measure response and semantic conflict and we presented the trial types in pure blocks to maximize response conflict and therefore better distinguish between the conflict types. Our data indicate that the left inferior PFC plays an important role in the processing of both response and semantic (or stimulus) conflict, whilst regions of the left parietal cortex (BA40) play an accompanying role in response, but not semantic, conflict processing. Moreover, our study reports a role for the right mediodorsal thalamus in processing semantic, but not response, conflict. In none of our comparisons did we observe activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a finding we ascribe to the use of blocked trial type presentation and one that has implications for theories of ACC function.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33112/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task.
Authors: Parris, B., Wadsley, M.G., Hasshim, N., Benattayallah, A., Augustinova, M. and Ferrand, L.
Journal: Frontiers in Psychology
Volume: 10
ISSN: 1664-1078
Abstract:An enduring question in selective attention research is whether we can successfully ignore an irrelevant stimulus and at what point in the stream of processing we are able to select the appropriate source of information. Using methods informed by recent research on the varieties of conflict in the Stroop task the present study provides evidence for specialized functions of regions of the frontoparietal network in processing response and semantic conflict during Stroop task performance. Specifically, we used trial types and orthogonal contrasts thought to better independently measure response and semantic conflict and we presented the trial types in pure blocks to maximize response conflict and therefore better distinguish between the conflict types. Our data indicate that the left inferior PFC plays an important role in the processing of both response and semantic (or stimulus) conflict, whilst regions of the left parietal cortex (BA40) play an accompanying role in response, but not semantic, conflict processing. Moreover, our study reports a role for the right mediodorsal thalamus in processing semantic, but not response, conflict. In none of our comparisons did we observe activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a finding we ascribe to the use of blocked trial type presentation and one that has implications for theories of ACC function.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33112/
Source: BURO EPrints