Reevaluating the role of verbalization of faces for composite production: Descriptions of offenders matter!
Authors: Brown, C., Portch, E., Nelson, L. and Frowd, C.D.
Journal: J Exp Psychol Appl
Volume: 26
Issue: 2
Pages: 248-265
eISSN: 1939-2192
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000251
Abstract:Standard forensic practice necessitates that a witness describes an offender's face prior to constructing a visual likeness, a facial composite. However, describing a face can interfere with face recognition, although a delay between description and recognition theoretically should alleviate this issue. In Experiment 1, participants produced a free recall description either 3-4 hr or 2 days after intentionally or incidentally encoding a target face, and then constructed a composite using a modern "feature" system immediately or after 30 min. Unexpectedly, correct naming of composites significantly reduced following the 30-min delay between description and construction for targets encoded 2 days previously. In Experiment 2, participants in these conditions gave descriptions that were better matched to their targets by independent judges, a result which suggests that the 30-min delay actually impairs access to details of recalled descriptions that are valuable for composite effectiveness. Experiment 3 found the detrimental effect of description delay extended to composites constructed from a "holistic" face production system. The results have real-world but counterintuitive implications for witnesses who construct a face 1 or 2 days after a crime: After having recalled the face to a practitioner, an appreciable delay (here, 30 min) should be avoided before starting face construction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33133/
Source: PubMed
Reevaluating the Role of Verbalization of Faces for Composite Production: Descriptions of Offenders Matter!
Authors: Brown, C., Portch, E., Nelson, L. and Frowd, C.D.
Journal: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED
Volume: 26
Issue: 2
Pages: 248-265
eISSN: 1939-2192
ISSN: 1076-898X
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000251
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33133/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Reevaluating the role of verbalisation of faces for composite production: Descriptions of offenders matter!
Authors: Brown, C., Portch, E., Nelson, L. and Frowd, C.D.
Journal: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Publisher: APA
ISSN: 1076-898X
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33133/
Source: Manual
Reevaluating the role of verbalization of faces for composite production: Descriptions of offenders matter!
Authors: Brown, C., Portch, E., Nelson, L. and Frowd, C.D.
Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. Applied
Volume: 26
Issue: 2
Pages: 248-265
eISSN: 1939-2192
ISSN: 1076-898X
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000251
Abstract:Standard forensic practice necessitates that a witness describes an offender's face prior to constructing a visual likeness, a facial composite. However, describing a face can interfere with face recognition, although a delay between description and recognition theoretically should alleviate this issue. In Experiment 1, participants produced a free recall description either 3-4 hr or 2 days after intentionally or incidentally encoding a target face, and then constructed a composite using a modern "feature" system immediately or after 30 min. Unexpectedly, correct naming of composites significantly reduced following the 30-min delay between description and construction for targets encoded 2 days previously. In Experiment 2, participants in these conditions gave descriptions that were better matched to their targets by independent judges, a result which suggests that the 30-min delay actually impairs access to details of recalled descriptions that are valuable for composite effectiveness. Experiment 3 found the detrimental effect of description delay extended to composites constructed from a "holistic" face production system. The results have real-world but counterintuitive implications for witnesses who construct a face 1 or 2 days after a crime: After having recalled the face to a practitioner, an appreciable delay (here, 30 min) should be avoided before starting face construction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33133/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Reevaluating the role of verbalisation of faces for composite production: Descriptions of offenders matter!
Authors: Brown, C., Portch, E., Nelson, L. and Frowd, C.D.
Journal: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume: 26
Issue: 2
Pages: 248-265
ISSN: 1939-2192
Abstract:Standard forensic practice necessitates that a witness describes an offender’s face prior to constructing a visual likeness, a facial composite. However, describing a face can interfere with face recognition, although a delay between description and recognition theoretically should alleviate this issue. In Experiment 1, participants produced a free recall description either 3-4 hours or 2 days after intentionally or incidentally encoding a target face, and then constructed a composite using a modern ‘feature’ system immediately or after 30-minutes. Unexpectedly, correct naming of composites significantly reduced following the 30-minute delay between description and construction for targets encoded 2 days previously. In, Experiment 2, participants in these conditions gave descriptions that were better matched to their targets by independent judges, a result which suggests that the 30-minute delay actually impairs access to details of recalled descriptions that are valuable for composite effectiveness. Experiment 3 found the detrimental effect of description delay extended to composites constructed from a ‘holistic’ face production system. The results have real-world but counterintuitive implications for witnesses who construct a face one or two days after a crime: after having recalled the face to a practitioner, an appreciable delay (here, 30 minutes) should be avoided before starting face construction.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33133/
Source: BURO EPrints