Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque and myocardial scar tissue in acute myocardial infarction

Authors: Marchesseau, S., Seneviratna, A., Sjöholm, A.T., Qin, D.L., Ho, J.X.M., Hausenloy, D.J., Townsend, D.W., Richards, A.M., Totman, J.J. and Chan, M.Y.Y.

Journal: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volume: 25

Issue: 6

Pages: 2001-2011

eISSN: 1532-6551

ISSN: 1071-3581

DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0918-8

Abstract:

Background: Following an acute coronary syndrome, combined CT and PET with 18F-NaF can identify coronary atherosclerotic plaques that have ruptured or eroded. However, the processes behind 18F-NaF uptake in vulnerable plaques remain unclear. Methods and Results: Ten patients with STEMI were scanned after 18F-NaF injection, for 75 minutes in a Siemens PET/MR scanner using delayed enhancement (LGE). They were then scanned in a Siemens PET/CT scanner for 10 minutes. Tissue-to-background ratio (TBR) was compared between the culprit lesion in the IRA and remote non-culprit lesions in an effort to independently validate prior studies. Additionally, we performed a proof-of-principle study comparing TBR in scar tissue and remote myocardium using LGE images and PET/MR or PET/CT data. From the 33 coronary lesions detected on PET/CT, TBRs for culprit lesions were higher than for non-culprit lesions (TBR = 2.11 ± 0.45 vs 1.46 ± 0.48; P < 0.001). Interestingly, the TBR measured on the PET/CT was higher for infarcted myocardium than for remote myocardium (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 vs 0.71 ± 0.05; P = 0.003). These results were confirmed using the PET/MR data (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 for scar, TBR = 0.71 ± 0.06 for healthy myocardium, P = 0.03). Conclusions: We confirmed the potential of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging to detect vulnerable coronary lesions. Moreover, we demonstrated proof-of-principle that 18F-NaF concurrently detects myocardial scar tissue.

Source: Scopus

Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque and myocardial scar tissue in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors: Marchesseau, S., Seneviratna, A., Sjöholm, A.T., Qin, D.L., Ho, J.X.M., Hausenloy, D.J., Townsend, D.W., Richards, A.M., Totman, J.J. and Chan, M.Y.Y.

Journal: J Nucl Cardiol

Volume: 25

Issue: 6

Pages: 2001-2011

eISSN: 1532-6551

DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0918-8

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Following an acute coronary syndrome, combined CT and PET with 18F-NaF can identify coronary atherosclerotic plaques that have ruptured or eroded. However, the processes behind 18F-NaF uptake in vulnerable plaques remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with STEMI were scanned after 18F-NaF injection, for 75 minutes in a Siemens PET/MR scanner using delayed enhancement (LGE). They were then scanned in a Siemens PET/CT scanner for 10 minutes. Tissue-to-background ratio (TBR) was compared between the culprit lesion in the IRA and remote non-culprit lesions in an effort to independently validate prior studies. Additionally, we performed a proof-of-principle study comparing TBR in scar tissue and remote myocardium using LGE images and PET/MR or PET/CT data. From the 33 coronary lesions detected on PET/CT, TBRs for culprit lesions were higher than for non-culprit lesions (TBR = 2.11 ± 0.45 vs 1.46 ± 0.48; P < 0.001). Interestingly, the TBR measured on the PET/CT was higher for infarcted myocardium than for remote myocardium (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 vs 0.71 ± 0.05; P = 0.003). These results were confirmed using the PET/MR data (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 for scar, TBR = 0.71 ± 0.06 for healthy myocardium, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the potential of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging to detect vulnerable coronary lesions. Moreover, we demonstrated proof-of-principle that 18F-NaF concurrently detects myocardial scar tissue.

Source: PubMed

Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque and myocardial scar tissue in acute myocardial infarction

Authors: Marchesseau, S., Seneviratna, A., Sjöholm, A.T., Qin, D.L., Ho, J.X.M., Hausenloy, D.J., Townsend, D.W., Richards, A.M., Totman, J.J. and Chan, M.Y.Y.

Journal: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volume: 25

Pages: 2001-2011

Publisher: Springer US

Source: Manual

Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque and myocardial scar tissue in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors: Marchesseau, S., Seneviratna, A., Sjöholm, A.T., Qin, D.L., Ho, J.X.M., Hausenloy, D.J., Townsend, D.W., Richards, A.M., Totman, J.J. and Chan, M.Y.Y.

Journal: Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Volume: 25

Issue: 6

Pages: 2001-2011

eISSN: 1532-6551

ISSN: 1071-3581

DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0918-8

Abstract:

Background

Following an acute coronary syndrome, combined CT and PET with 18F-NaF can identify coronary atherosclerotic plaques that have ruptured or eroded. However, the processes behind 18F-NaF uptake in vulnerable plaques remain unclear.

Methods and results

Ten patients with STEMI were scanned after 18F-NaF injection, for 75 minutes in a Siemens PET/MR scanner using delayed enhancement (LGE). They were then scanned in a Siemens PET/CT scanner for 10 minutes. Tissue-to-background ratio (TBR) was compared between the culprit lesion in the IRA and remote non-culprit lesions in an effort to independently validate prior studies. Additionally, we performed a proof-of-principle study comparing TBR in scar tissue and remote myocardium using LGE images and PET/MR or PET/CT data. From the 33 coronary lesions detected on PET/CT, TBRs for culprit lesions were higher than for non-culprit lesions (TBR = 2.11 ± 0.45 vs 1.46 ± 0.48; P < 0.001). Interestingly, the TBR measured on the PET/CT was higher for infarcted myocardium than for remote myocardium (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 vs 0.71 ± 0.05; P = 0.003). These results were confirmed using the PET/MR data (TBR = 0.81 ± 0.10 for scar, TBR = 0.71 ± 0.06 for healthy myocardium, P = 0.03).

Conclusions

We confirmed the potential of 18F-NaF PET/CT imaging to detect vulnerable coronary lesions. Moreover, we demonstrated proof-of-principle that 18F-NaF concurrently detects myocardial scar tissue.

Source: Europe PubMed Central