Young peoples’ tech identity performances: why materiality matters

Authors: Godec, S., Patel, U., Archer, L. and Dawson, E.

Journal: International Journal of STEM Education

Volume: 7

Issue: 1

eISSN: 2196-7822

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00249-w

Abstract:

Background: Identity provides a useful conceptual lens for understanding educational inequalities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). In this paper, we examine how paying attention to physical and digital ‘materiality’ enriches our understanding of identity work, by going beyond the spoken, written and embodied dimensions of identity performances that currently dominate the area of STEM identity scholarship. We draw on a multimodal ethnographic study with 36 young people aged 11–14 carried out over the course of one year at four UK-based informal STEM learning settings. Data collection included a series of interviews, observations and youth-created portfolios focused on STEM experiences. Illustrative case studies of two young men who took part in a community-based digital arts centre are discussed in detail through the theoretical lenses of Judith Butler’s identity performativity and Karen Barad’s intra-action. Results: We argue that physical and digital materiality mattered for the performances of ‘tech identity’ in that (i) the focus on the material changed our understanding of tech identity performances; (ii) digital spaces supported identity performances alongside, with and beyond physical bodies, and drew attention to new forms of identity recognition; (iii) identity performances across spaces were unpredictable and contained by the limits of material possibilities; and (iv) particular identity performances associated with technology were aligned with dominant enactments of masculinity and might thus be less accessible to some young people. Conclusion: We conclude the paper by suggesting that accounting for materiality in STEM identity research not only guides researchers in going beyond what participants say and are observed doing (and thus engendering richer insights), but also offers more equitable ways of enacting research. Further, we argue that more needs to be done to support the translation of identity resources across spaces, such as between experiences within informal and online spaces, on the one hand, and formal education, on the other.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36427/

Source: Scopus

Young peoples' tech identity performances: why materiality matters

Authors: Godec, S., Patel, U., Archer, L. and Dawson, E.

Journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION

Volume: 7

Issue: 1

ISSN: 2196-7822

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00249-w

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36427/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

Young peoples? tech identity performances: why materiality matters

Authors: Godec, S., Patel, U., Archer, L. and Dawson, E.

Journal: International Journal of STEM Education

Volume: 7

Issue: 51

Pages: 1-12

DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00249-w

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36427/

Source: Manual

Young people's tech identity performances: why materiality matters

Authors: Godec, S., Patel, U., Archer, L. and Dawson, E.

Journal: International Journal of STEM Education

Volume: 7

ISSN: 2196-7822

Abstract:

Background Identity provides a useful conceptual lens for understanding educational inequalities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). In this paper, we examine how paying attention to physical and digital ‘materiality’ enriches our understanding of identity work, by going beyond the spoken, written and embodied dimensions of identity performances that currently dominate the area of STEM identity scholarship. We draw on a multimodal ethnographic study with 36 young people aged 11–14 carried out over the course of one year at four UK-based informal STEM learning settings. Data collection included a series of interviews, observations and youth-created portfolios focused on STEM experiences. Illustrative case studies of two young men who took part in a community-based digital arts centre are discussed in detail through the theoretical lenses of Judith Butler’s identity performativity and Karen Barad’s intra-action.

Results We argue that physical and digital materiality mattered for the performances of ‘tech identity’ in that (i) the focus on the material changed our understanding of tech identity performances; (ii) digital spaces supported identity performances alongside, with and beyond physical bodies, and drew attention to new forms of identity recognition; (iii) identity performances across spaces were unpredictable and contained by the limits of material possibilities; and (iv) particular identity performances associated with technology were aligned with dominant enactments of masculinity and might thus be less accessible to some young people.

Conclusion We conclude the paper by suggesting that accounting for materiality in STEM identity research not only guides researchers in going beyond what participants say and are observed doing (and thus engendering richer insights), but also offers more equitable ways of enacting research. Further, we argue that more needs to be done to support the translation of identity resources across spaces, such as between experiences within informal and online spaces, on the one hand, and formal education, on the other.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36427/

Source: BURO EPrints