Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
Authors: Adedeji, V.I., Vasilev, M.R., Kirkby, J.A. and Slattery, T.J.
Journal: Psychological Research
Volume: 86
Issue: 6
Pages: 1804-1815
eISSN: 1430-2772
ISSN: 0340-0727
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6
Abstract:Recent research on return-sweep saccades has improved our understanding of eye movements when reading paragraphs. However, these saccades, which take our gaze from the end of one line to the start of the next line, have been studied only within the context of silent reading. Articulatory demands and the coordination of the eye–voice span (EVS) at line boundaries suggest that the execution of this saccade may be different in oral reading. We compared launch and landing positions of return-sweeps, corrective saccade probability and fixations adjacent to return-sweeps in skilled adult readers while reading paragraphs aloud and silently. Compared to silent reading, return-sweeps were launched from closer to the end of the line and landed closer to the start of the next line when reading aloud. The probability of making a corrective saccade was higher for oral reading than silent reading. These indicate that oral reading may compel readers to rely more on foveal processing at the expense of parafoveal processing. We found an interaction between reading modality and fixation type on fixation durations. The reading modality effect (i.e., increased fixation durations in oral compared to silent reading) was greater for accurate line-initial fixations and marginally greater for line-final fixations compared to intra-line fixations. This suggests that readers may use the fixations adjacent to return-sweeps as natural pause locations to modulate the EVS.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36143/
Source: Scopus
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.
Authors: Adedeji, V.I., Vasilev, M.R., Kirkby, J.A. and Slattery, T.J.
Journal: Psychol Res
Volume: 86
Issue: 6
Pages: 1804-1815
eISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6
Abstract:Recent research on return-sweep saccades has improved our understanding of eye movements when reading paragraphs. However, these saccades, which take our gaze from the end of one line to the start of the next line, have been studied only within the context of silent reading. Articulatory demands and the coordination of the eye-voice span (EVS) at line boundaries suggest that the execution of this saccade may be different in oral reading. We compared launch and landing positions of return-sweeps, corrective saccade probability and fixations adjacent to return-sweeps in skilled adult readers while reading paragraphs aloud and silently. Compared to silent reading, return-sweeps were launched from closer to the end of the line and landed closer to the start of the next line when reading aloud. The probability of making a corrective saccade was higher for oral reading than silent reading. These indicate that oral reading may compel readers to rely more on foveal processing at the expense of parafoveal processing. We found an interaction between reading modality and fixation type on fixation durations. The reading modality effect (i.e., increased fixation durations in oral compared to silent reading) was greater for accurate line-initial fixations and marginally greater for line-final fixations compared to intra-line fixations. This suggests that readers may use the fixations adjacent to return-sweeps as natural pause locations to modulate the EVS.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36143/
Source: PubMed
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
Authors: Adedeji, V.I., Vasilev, M.R., Kirkby, J.A. and Slattery, T.J.
Journal: PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG
Volume: 86
Issue: 6
Pages: 1804-1815
eISSN: 1430-2772
ISSN: 0340-0727
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36143/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
Authors: Adedeji, V.I., Vasilev, M., Kirkby, J. and Slattery, T.
Journal: Psychological Research
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36143/
Source: Manual
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.
Authors: Adedeji, V.I., Vasilev, M.R., Kirkby, J.A. and Slattery, T.J.
Journal: Psychological research
Volume: 86
Issue: 6
Pages: 1804-1815
eISSN: 1430-2772
ISSN: 0340-0727
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01610-6
Abstract:Recent research on return-sweep saccades has improved our understanding of eye movements when reading paragraphs. However, these saccades, which take our gaze from the end of one line to the start of the next line, have been studied only within the context of silent reading. Articulatory demands and the coordination of the eye-voice span (EVS) at line boundaries suggest that the execution of this saccade may be different in oral reading. We compared launch and landing positions of return-sweeps, corrective saccade probability and fixations adjacent to return-sweeps in skilled adult readers while reading paragraphs aloud and silently. Compared to silent reading, return-sweeps were launched from closer to the end of the line and landed closer to the start of the next line when reading aloud. The probability of making a corrective saccade was higher for oral reading than silent reading. These indicate that oral reading may compel readers to rely more on foveal processing at the expense of parafoveal processing. We found an interaction between reading modality and fixation type on fixation durations. The reading modality effect (i.e., increased fixation durations in oral compared to silent reading) was greater for accurate line-initial fixations and marginally greater for line-final fixations compared to intra-line fixations. This suggests that readers may use the fixations adjacent to return-sweeps as natural pause locations to modulate the EVS.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36143/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Return-sweep saccades in oral reading
Authors: Adedeji, V.I., Vasilev, M.R., Kirkby, J.A. and Slattery, T.
Journal: Psychological Research
Volume: 86
Pages: 1804-1815
ISSN: 0340-0727
Abstract:Recent research on return-sweep saccades has improved our understanding of eye movements when reading paragraphs.
However, these saccades, which take our gaze from the end of one line to the start of the next line, have been studied only within the context of silent reading. Articulatory demands and the coordination of the eye–voice span (EVS) at line boundaries suggest that the execution of this saccade may be diferent in oral reading. We compared launch and landing positions of return-sweeps, corrective saccade probability and fxations adjacent to return-sweeps in skilled adult readers while reading paragraphs aloud and silently. Compared to silent reading, return-sweeps were launched from closer to the end of the line and landed closer to the start of the next line when reading aloud. The probability of making a corrective saccade was higher for oral reading than silent reading. These indicate that oral reading may compel readers to rely more on foveal processing at the expense of parafoveal processing. We found an interaction between reading modality and fxation type on fxation durations. The reading modality efect (i.e., increased fxation durations in oral compared to silent reading) was greater for accurate line-initial fxations and marginally greater for line-fnal fxations compared to intra-line fxations. This suggests that readers may use the fxations adjacent to return-sweeps as natural pause locations to modulate the EVS.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/36143/
Source: BURO EPrints