The reliability of video fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography for measurements of lumbar spine segmental range of motion in-vivo: A review
Authors: Daniel, E.S., Lee, R.Y.W. and Williams, J.M.
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Volume: 36
Issue: 1
Pages: 117-135
eISSN: 1878-6324
ISSN: 1053-8127
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-210285
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Lower back pain (LBP) is a principal cause of disability worldwide and is associated with a variety of spinal conditions. Individuals presenting with LBP may display changes in spinal motion. Despite this, the ability to measure lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) non-invasively remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To review the reliability of four non-invasive modalities: Video Fluoroscopy (VF), Ultrasound imaging (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radiography used for measuring segmental ROM in the lumbar spine in-vivo. METHODS: The methodological quality of seventeen eligible studies, identified through a systematic literature search, were appraised. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability for VF is excellent in recumbent and upright positions but errors are larger for intra-rater repeated movements and inter-rater reliability shows larger variation. Excellent results for intra- A nd inter-rater reliability are seen in US studies and there is good reliability within- A nd between-day. There is a large degree of heterogeneity in MRI and radiography methodologies but reliable results are seen. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent reliability is seen across all modalities. However, VF and radiography are limited by radiation exposure and MRI is expensive. US offers a non-invasive, risk free method but further research must determine whether it yields truly consistent measurements.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38120/
Source: Scopus
The reliability of video fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography for measurements of lumbar spine segmental range of motion in-vivo: A review.
Authors: Daniel, E.S., Lee, R.Y.W. and Williams, J.M.
Journal: J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil
Volume: 36
Issue: 1
Pages: 117-135
eISSN: 1878-6324
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-210285
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Lower back pain (LBP) is a principal cause of disability worldwide and is associated with a variety of spinal conditions. Individuals presenting with LBP may display changes in spinal motion. Despite this, the ability to measure lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) non-invasively remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To review the reliability of four non-invasive modalities: Video Fluoroscopy (VF), Ultrasound imaging (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radiography used for measuring segmental ROM in the lumbar spine in-vivo. METHODS: The methodological quality of seventeen eligible studies, identified through a systematic literature search, were appraised. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability for VF is excellent in recumbent and upright positions but errors are larger for intra-rater repeated movements and inter-rater reliability shows larger variation. Excellent results for intra- and inter-rater reliability are seen in US studies and there is good reliability within- and between-day. There is a large degree of heterogeneity in MRI and radiography methodologies but reliable results are seen. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent reliability is seen across all modalities. However, VF and radiography are limited by radiation exposure and MRI is expensive. US offers a non-invasive, risk free method but further research must determine whether it yields truly consistent measurements.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38120/
Source: PubMed
The reliability of video fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography for measurements of lumbar spine segmental range of motion <i>in</i>-<i>vivo</i>: A review
Authors: Daniel, E.S., Lee, R.Y.W. and Williams, J.M.
Journal: JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION
Volume: 36
Issue: 1
Pages: 117-135
eISSN: 1878-6324
ISSN: 1053-8127
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-210285
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38120/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
The reliability of video fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography for measurements of lumbar spine segmental range of motion in-vivo: A review.
Authors: Daniel, E.S., Lee, R.Y.W. and Williams, J.M.
Journal: Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation
Volume: 36
Issue: 1
Pages: 117-135
eISSN: 1878-6324
ISSN: 1053-8127
DOI: 10.3233/bmr-210285
Abstract:Background
Lower back pain (LBP) is a principal cause of disability worldwide and is associated with a variety of spinal conditions. Individuals presenting with LBP may display changes in spinal motion. Despite this, the ability to measure lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) non-invasively remains a challenge.Objective
To review the reliability of four non-invasive modalities: Video Fluoroscopy (VF), Ultrasound imaging (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radiography used for measuring segmental ROM in the lumbar spine in-vivo.Methods
The methodological quality of seventeen eligible studies, identified through a systematic literature search, were appraised.Results
The intra-rater reliability for VF is excellent in recumbent and upright positions but errors are larger for intra-rater repeated movements and inter-rater reliability shows larger variation. Excellent results for intra- and inter-rater reliability are seen in US studies and there is good reliability within- and between-day. There is a large degree of heterogeneity in MRI and radiography methodologies but reliable results are seen.Conclusions
Excellent reliability is seen across all modalities. However, VF and radiography are limited by radiation exposure and MRI is expensive. US offers a non-invasive, risk free method but further research must determine whether it yields truly consistent measurements.https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38120/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
The reliability of video fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography for measurements of lumbar spine segmental range of motion in-vivo: A review.
Authors: Daniel, E.S., Lee, R.Y.W. and Williams, J.M.
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Volume: 36
Issue: 1
Pages: 117-135
ISSN: 1053-8127
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Lower back pain (LBP) is a principal cause of disability worldwide and is associated with a variety of spinal conditions. Individuals presenting with LBP may display changes in spinal motion. Despite this, the ability to measure lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) non-invasively remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To review the reliability of four non-invasive modalities: Video Fluoroscopy (VF), Ultrasound imaging (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radiography used for measuring segmental ROM in the lumbar spine in-vivo. METHODS: The methodological quality of seventeen eligible studies, identified through a systematic literature search, were appraised. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability for VF is excellent in recumbent and upright positions but errors are larger for intra-rater repeated movements and inter-rater reliability shows larger variation. Excellent results for intra- and inter-rater reliability are seen in US studies and there is good reliability within- and between-day. There is a large degree of heterogeneity in MRI and radiography methodologies but reliable results are seen. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent reliability is seen across all modalities. However, VF and radiography are limited by radiation exposure and MRI is expensive. US offers a non-invasive, risk free method but further research must determine whether it yields truly consistent measurements.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38120/
Source: BURO EPrints