Test-retest reliability and task order effects of emotional cognitive tests in healthy subjects.

Authors: Adams, T., Pounder, Z., Preston, S., Hanson, A., Gallagher, P., Harmer, C.J. and McAllister-Williams, R.H.

Journal: Cogn Emot

Volume: 30

Issue: 7

Pages: 1247-1259

eISSN: 1464-0600

DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1055713

Abstract:

Little is known of the retest reliability of emotional cognitive tasks or the impact of using different tasks employing similar emotional stimuli within a battery. We investigated this in healthy subjects. We found improved overall performance in an emotional attentional blink task (EABT) with repeat testing at one hour and one week compared to baseline, but the impact of an emotional stimulus on performance was unchanged. Similarly, performance on a facial expression recognition task (FERT) was better one week after a baseline test, though the relative effect of specific emotions was unaltered. There was no effect of repeat testing on an emotional word categorising, recall and recognition task. We found no difference in performance in the FERT and EABT irrespective of task order. We concluded that it is possible to use emotional cognitive tasks in longitudinal studies and combine tasks using emotional facial stimuli in a single battery.

Source: PubMed

Test-retest reliability and task order effects of emotional cognitive tests in healthy subjects

Authors: Adams, T., Pounder, Z., Preston, S., Hanson, A., Gallagher, P., Harmer, C.J. and McAllister-Williams, R.H.

Journal: COGNITION & EMOTION

Volume: 30

Issue: 7

Pages: 1247-1259

eISSN: 1464-0600

ISSN: 0269-9931

DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1055713

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

Test–retest reliability and task order effects of emotional cognitive tests in healthy subjects

Authors: Thomas, A., Pounder, Z., Preston, S., Hanson, A., Gallagher, P. and Harmer, C.

Journal: Cognition and Emotion

Volume: 30

Issue: 7

Pages: 1247-1259

Publisher: Taylor & Francis

DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1055713

Abstract:

Little is known of the retest reliability of emotional cognitive tasks or the impact of using different tasks employing similar emotional stimuli within a battery. We investigated this in healthy subjects. We found improved overall performance in an emotional attentional blink task (EABT) with repeat testing at one hour and one week compared to baseline, but the impact of an emotional stimulus on performance was unchanged. Similarly, performance on a facial expression recognition task (FERT) was better one week after a baseline test, though the relative effect of specific emotions was unaltered. There was no effect of repeat testing on an emotional word categorising, recall and recognition task. We found no difference in performance in the FERT and EABT irrespective of task order. We concluded that it is possible to use emotional cognitive tasks in longitudinal studies and combine tasks using emotional facial stimuli in a single battery.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699931.2015.1055713?casa_token=NdB0qKi8MP8AAAAA%3AeKduWRlok841TGojFXKFGOIw7dbAA9mbY1XnNUPEwbqWzaSx6RASws-nbcEF8J3b5md9jFMMnztE8g

Source: Manual

Test-retest reliability and task order effects of emotional cognitive tests in healthy subjects.

Authors: Adams, T., Pounder, Z., Preston, S., Hanson, A., Gallagher, P., Harmer, C.J. and McAllister-Williams, R.H.

Journal: Cognition & emotion

Volume: 30

Issue: 7

Pages: 1247-1259

eISSN: 1464-0600

ISSN: 0269-9931

DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1055713

Abstract:

Little is known of the retest reliability of emotional cognitive tasks or the impact of using different tasks employing similar emotional stimuli within a battery. We investigated this in healthy subjects. We found improved overall performance in an emotional attentional blink task (EABT) with repeat testing at one hour and one week compared to baseline, but the impact of an emotional stimulus on performance was unchanged. Similarly, performance on a facial expression recognition task (FERT) was better one week after a baseline test, though the relative effect of specific emotions was unaltered. There was no effect of repeat testing on an emotional word categorising, recall and recognition task. We found no difference in performance in the FERT and EABT irrespective of task order. We concluded that it is possible to use emotional cognitive tasks in longitudinal studies and combine tasks using emotional facial stimuli in a single battery.

Source: Europe PubMed Central