How Waun Mawn stone circle was designed and built, and when the Bluestones arrived at Stonehenge: A response to Darvill

Authors: Parker Pearson, M., Welham, K. et al.

Journal: Antiquity

Volume: 96

Issue: 390

Pages: 1530-1537

ISSN: 0003-598X

DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2022.132

Abstract:

In response to Timothy Darvill's article, 'Mythical rings?' (this issue), which argues for an alternative interpretation of Waun Mawn circle and its relationship with Stonehenge, Parker Pearson and colleagues report new evidence from the Welsh site and elaborate on aspects of their original argument. The discovery of a hearth at the centre of the circle, as well as further features around its circumference, reinforces the authors' original interpretation. The authors explore the evidence for the construction sequence, which was abandoned before the completion of the monument. Contesting Darvill's argument that the Aubrey Holes at Stonehenge originally held posts, the authors reassert their interpretation of this circle of cut features as Bluestone settings.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37846/

Source: Scopus

How Waun Mawn stone circle was designed and built, and when the Bluestones arrived at Stonehenge: a response to Darvill

Authors: Parker Pearson, M., Welham, K. et al.

Journal: ANTIQUITY

Volume: 96

Issue: 390

Pages: 1530-1537

eISSN: 1745-1744

ISSN: 0003-598X

DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2022.132

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37846/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

How Waun Mawn stone circle was designed and built, and when the Bluestones arrived at Stonehenge: a response to Darvill

Authors: Parker Pearson, M., Welham, K. et al.

Journal: Antiquity

Volume: 96

Issue: 390

Pages: 1530-1537

ISSN: 0003-598X

Abstract:

In response to Timothy Darvill's article, 'Mythical rings?' (this issue), which argues for an alternative interpretation of Waun Mawn circle and its relationship with Stonehenge, Parker Pearson and colleagues report new evidence from the Welsh site and elaborate on aspects of their original argument. The discovery of a hearth at the centre of the circle, as well as further features around its circumference, reinforces the authors' original interpretation. The authors explore the evidence for the construction sequence, which was abandoned before the completion of the monument. Contesting Darvill's argument that the Aubrey Holes at Stonehenge originally held posts, the authors reassert their interpretation of this circle of cut features as Bluestone settings.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37846/

Source: BURO EPrints