Validation of general pain scores from multidomain assessment tools in stroke
Authors: Ali, M., Tibble, H., Brady, M.C., Quinn, T.J., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Venketasubramanian, N., Shuaib, A., Pandyan, A. and Mead, G.
Journal: Frontiers in Neurology
Volume: 15
eISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1328832
Abstract:Purpose: We describe how well general pain reported in multidomain assessment tools correlated with pain-specific assessment tools; associations between general pain, activities of daily living and independence after stroke. Materials and methods: Analyses of individual participant data (IPD) from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) described correlation coefficients examining (i) direct comparisons of assessments from pain-specific and multidomain assessment tools that included pain, (ii) indirect comparisons of pain assessments with the Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and (iii) whether pain identification could be enhanced by accounting for reported usual activities, self-care, mobility and anxiety/depression; factors associated with pain. Results: European Quality of Life 3- and 5-Level (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L), RAND 36 Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36) or the 0–10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were available from 10/94 studies (IPD = 10,002). The 0–10 NPRS was the only available pain-specific assessment tool and was a reference for comparison with other tools. Pearson correlation coefficients between the 0–10 NPRS and (A) the EQ-5D-3L and (B) EQ5D-5 L were r = 0.572 (n = 436) and r = 0.305 (n = 1,134), respectively. mRS was better aligned with pain by EQ-5D-3L (n = 8,966; r = 0.340) than by SF-36 (n = 623; r = 0.318). BI aligned better with pain by SF-36 (n = 623; r = −0.320). Creating a composite score using the EQ-5D 3 L and 5 L comprising pain, mobility, usual-activities, self-care and anxiety/depression did not improve correlation with the 0–10 NPRS. Discussion: The EQ-5D-3L pain domain aligned better than the EQ-5D-5L with the 0–10 NPRS and may inform general pain description where resources and assessment burden hinder use of additional, pain-specific assessments.
Source: Scopus
Validation of general pain scores from multidomain assessment tools in stroke.
Authors: Ali, M., Tibble, H., Brady, M.C., Quinn, T.J., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Venketasubramanian, N., Shuaib, A., Pandyan, A. and Mead, G.
Journal: Front Neurol
Volume: 15
Pages: 1328832
ISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1328832
Abstract:PURPOSE: We describe how well general pain reported in multidomain assessment tools correlated with pain-specific assessment tools; associations between general pain, activities of daily living and independence after stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analyses of individual participant data (IPD) from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) described correlation coefficients examining (i) direct comparisons of assessments from pain-specific and multidomain assessment tools that included pain, (ii) indirect comparisons of pain assessments with the Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and (iii) whether pain identification could be enhanced by accounting for reported usual activities, self-care, mobility and anxiety/depression; factors associated with pain. RESULTS: European Quality of Life 3- and 5-Level (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L), RAND 36 Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36) or the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were available from 10/94 studies (IPD = 10,002). The 0-10 NPRS was the only available pain-specific assessment tool and was a reference for comparison with other tools. Pearson correlation coefficients between the 0-10 NPRS and (A) the EQ-5D-3L and (B) EQ5D-5 L were r = 0.572 (n = 436) and r = 0.305 (n = 1,134), respectively. mRS was better aligned with pain by EQ-5D-3L (n = 8,966; r = 0.340) than by SF-36 (n = 623; r = 0.318). BI aligned better with pain by SF-36 (n = 623; r = -0.320). Creating a composite score using the EQ-5D 3 L and 5 L comprising pain, mobility, usual-activities, self-care and anxiety/depression did not improve correlation with the 0-10 NPRS. DISCUSSION: The EQ-5D-3L pain domain aligned better than the EQ-5D-5L with the 0-10 NPRS and may inform general pain description where resources and assessment burden hinder use of additional, pain-specific assessments.
Source: PubMed
Validation of general pain scores from multidomain assessment tools in stroke
Authors: Ali, M., Tibble, H., Brady, M.C., Quinn, T.J., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Venketasubramanian, N., Shuaib, A., Pandyan, A. and Mead, G.
Journal: FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
Volume: 15
ISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1328832
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Validation of general pain scores from multidomain assessment tools in stroke.
Authors: Ali, M., Tibble, H., Brady, M.C., Quinn, T.J., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Venketasubramanian, N., Shuaib, A., Pandyan, A. and Mead, G.
Journal: Frontiers in neurology
Volume: 15
Pages: 1328832
eISSN: 1664-2295
ISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1328832
Abstract:Purpose
We describe how well general pain reported in multidomain assessment tools correlated with pain-specific assessment tools; associations between general pain, activities of daily living and independence after stroke.Materials and methods
Analyses of individual participant data (IPD) from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) described correlation coefficients examining (i) direct comparisons of assessments from pain-specific and multidomain assessment tools that included pain, (ii) indirect comparisons of pain assessments with the Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and (iii) whether pain identification could be enhanced by accounting for reported usual activities, self-care, mobility and anxiety/depression; factors associated with pain.Results
European Quality of Life 3- and 5-Level (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L), RAND 36 Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36) or the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were available from 10/94 studies (IPD = 10,002). The 0-10 NPRS was the only available pain-specific assessment tool and was a reference for comparison with other tools. Pearson correlation coefficients between the 0-10 NPRS and (A) the EQ-5D-3L and (B) EQ5D-5 L were r = 0.572 (n = 436) and r = 0.305 (n = 1,134), respectively. mRS was better aligned with pain by EQ-5D-3L (n = 8,966; r = 0.340) than by SF-36 (n = 623; r = 0.318). BI aligned better with pain by SF-36 (n = 623; r = -0.320). Creating a composite score using the EQ-5D 3 L and 5 L comprising pain, mobility, usual-activities, self-care and anxiety/depression did not improve correlation with the 0-10 NPRS.Discussion
The EQ-5D-3L pain domain aligned better than the EQ-5D-5L with the 0-10 NPRS and may inform general pain description where resources and assessment burden hinder use of additional, pain-specific assessments.Source: Europe PubMed Central