Intra- and interspecific competition resulting from spatial coexistence among larvae of closely-related caddisflies from the genus Hydropsyche.
Authors: Tszydel, M. and Błońska, D.
Journal: PeerJ
Volume: 10
Pages: e13576
ISSN: 2167-8359
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13576
Abstract:Caddisfly larvae commonly inhabit freshwater ecosystems, where they often create multi-species aggregations. However, while several strategies have been developed to avoid or reduce inter- and intraspecific interactions, most species choose the same time to seek a suitable place for pupation, which can increase competition. The current study assesses the competitive interactions among larvae (5th instar) of three co-existing Hydropsyche species, viz. H. contubernalis, H. pellucidula, and H. modesta, analysing their direct one-on-one interaction and various morphological features, such as size, weight, and mandibles. More than half of the interspecific conflicts ended with a draw, and 80% of intraspecific interactions with a decisive outcome. In fights between species, H. pellucidula was the most successful, and H. modesta the weakest. Our results confirm that among the larvae, competitive interactions were usually decided by body size, especially that of the head capsule. Although wider head capsule and higher weight were advantageous for ~60% of winning larvae, there were no distinct winning species. The chewing mouthpart turned out to be supportive in the fight: regardless of the species, longer and wider mandibles were significant for winning specimens, but not the distance between mandibles. Hence, acquiring a suitable place for pupation is determined by the possession of certain features enhancing the fighting potential of individual larvae, which does not exclude any species from the possibility of closing the life cycle. Future studies on interactions among caddisfly larvae could include experience in fights, volitional features and stridulation (not tested).
Source: PubMed
Intra- and interspecific competition resulting from spatial coexistence among larvae of closely-related caddisflies from the genus <i>Hydropsyche</i>
Authors: Tszydel, M. and Blonska, D.
Journal: PEERJ
Volume: 10
ISSN: 2167-8359
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13576
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Intra-and interspecific competition resulting from spatial coexistence among larvae of closely-related caddisflies from the genus Hydropsyche
Authors: Tszydel, M. and Błońska, D.
Journal: PeerJ
Volume: 10
Pages: e13576
Publisher: PeerJ Inc.
ISSN: 2167-8359
Source: Manual
Intra- and interspecific competition resulting from spatial coexistence among larvae of closely-related caddisflies from the genus <i>Hydropsyche</i>.
Authors: Tszydel, M. and Błońska, D.
Journal: PeerJ
Volume: 10
Pages: e13576
eISSN: 2167-8359
ISSN: 2167-8359
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13576
Abstract:Caddisfly larvae commonly inhabit freshwater ecosystems, where they often create multi-species aggregations. However, while several strategies have been developed to avoid or reduce inter- and intraspecific interactions, most species choose the same time to seek a suitable place for pupation, which can increase competition. The current study assesses the competitive interactions among larvae (5th instar) of three co-existing Hydropsyche species, viz. H. contubernalis, H. pellucidula, and H. modesta, analysing their direct one-on-one interaction and various morphological features, such as size, weight, and mandibles. More than half of the interspecific conflicts ended with a draw, and 80% of intraspecific interactions with a decisive outcome. In fights between species, H. pellucidula was the most successful, and H. modesta the weakest. Our results confirm that among the larvae, competitive interactions were usually decided by body size, especially that of the head capsule. Although wider head capsule and higher weight were advantageous for ~60% of winning larvae, there were no distinct winning species. The chewing mouthpart turned out to be supportive in the fight: regardless of the species, longer and wider mandibles were significant for winning specimens, but not the distance between mandibles. Hence, acquiring a suitable place for pupation is determined by the possession of certain features enhancing the fighting potential of individual larvae, which does not exclude any species from the possibility of closing the life cycle. Future studies on interactions among caddisfly larvae could include experience in fights, volitional features and stridulation (not tested).
Source: Europe PubMed Central