Contributions of Multi-Method Geophysical Survey to Archaeological Research at the Battlefield of Waterloo
Authors: Williams, D., Bosquet, D., Pollard, T., Welham, K., Eve, S. and De Smedt, P.
Journal: Archaeological Prospection
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
Pages: 267-287
eISSN: 1099-0763
ISSN: 1075-2196
DOI: 10.1002/arp.1952
Abstract:Archaeological prospection is continually expanding into new frontiers, examining increasingly large areas, diverse environmental contexts and varying site types. One area that has received only limited focus is historic battlefields. This paper presents results from large-scale geophysical surveys (> 100 ha) at the Napoleonic battlefield of Waterloo (1815) in Belgium, using fluxgate magnetometry and frequency-domain electromagnetic induction. Despite its international historical significance, professional archaeological research at the battlefield is still in its infancy. We demonstrate how important insights can be gained by using geophysical methods for identifying features and artefacts related to the battle and for developing an understanding of the various influences acting on the present landscape. The largest survey of its kind undertaken on a single battlefield site, this approach holds particular potential for battlefield archaeology, given the subtle and low-density nature of the sought-after targets and the extensive area of the site. Such an approach can mitigate (though not entirely resolve) challenges of resolution and scale associated with other methods of investigation. Using a representative range of examples from Waterloo, we consider successes and challenges in undertaking geophysical surveys on battlefield sites. An integrated approach that incorporates targeted sampling and other forms of ancillary data is emphasized for a more robust interpretation of noninvasive sensor data.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40306/
Source: Scopus
Contributions of Multi-Method Geophysical Survey to Archaeological Research at the Battlefield of Waterloo
Authors: Williams, D., Bosquet, D., Pollard, T., Welham, K., Eve, S. and De Smedt, P.
Journal: Archaeological Prospection
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN: 1075-2196
DOI: 10.1002/arp.1952
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40306/
Source: Manual
Contributions of Multi-Method Geophysical Survey to Archaeological Research at the Battlefield of Waterloo
Authors: Williams, D., Bosquet, D., Pollard, T., Welham, K., Eve, S. and De Smedt, P.
Journal: Archaeological Prospection
Volume: 31
Pages: 267-287
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN: 1075-2196
Abstract:Archaeological prospection is continually expanding into new frontiers, examining increasingly large areas, diverse environmental contexts and varying site types. One area that has received only limited focus is historic battlefields. This paper presents results from large-scale geophysical surveys (> 100 ha) at the Napoleonic battlefield of Waterloo (1815) in Belgium, using fluxgate magnetometry and frequency-domain electromagnetic induction. Despite its international historical significance, professional archaeological research at the battlefield is still in its infancy. We demonstrate how important insights can be gained by using geophysical methods for identifying features and artefacts related to the battle and for developing an understanding of the various influences acting on the present landscape. The largest survey of its kind undertaken on a single battlefield site, this approach holds particular potential for battlefield archaeology, given the subtle and low-density nature of the sought-after targets and the extensive area of the site. Such an approach can mitigate (though not entirely resolve) challenges of resolution and scale associated with other methods of investigation. Using a representative range of examples from Waterloo, we consider successes and challenges in undertaking geophysical surveys on battlefield sites. An integrated approach that incorporates targeted sampling and other forms of ancillary data is emphasized for a more robust interpretation of noninvasive sensor data.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40306/
Source: BURO EPrints