Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions
Authors: Liu, J., Chen, L., Gu, J., Buidze, T., Zhao, K., Liu, C.H., Zhang, Y., Gläscher, J. and Fu, X.
Journal: Consciousness and Cognition
Volume: 123
eISSN: 1090-2376
ISSN: 1053-8100
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103727
Abstract:The intentional binding effect refers to the phenomenon where the perceived temporal interval between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence is subjectively compressed. Prior research revealed the importance of tactile feedback from the keyboard on this effect. Here we examined the necessity of such tactile feedback by utilizing a touch-free key-press device without haptic feedback, and explored how initial/outcome sensory modalities (visual/auditory/tactile) and their consistency influence the intentional binding effect. Participants estimated three delay lengths (250, 550, or 850 ms) between the initial and outcome stimuli. Results showed that regardless of the combinations of sensory modalities between the initial and the outcome stimuli (i.e., modal consistency), the intentional binding effect was only observed in the 250 ms delay condition. This findings indicate a stable intentional binding effect both within and across sensory modalities, supporting the existence of a shared mechanism underlying the binding effect in touch-free voluntary actions.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40170/
Source: Scopus
Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions.
Authors: Liu, J., Chen, L., Gu, J., Buidze, T., Zhao, K., Liu, C.H., Zhang, Y., Gläscher, J. and Fu, X.
Journal: Conscious Cogn
Volume: 123
Pages: 103727
eISSN: 1090-2376
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103727
Abstract:The intentional binding effect refers to the phenomenon where the perceived temporal interval between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence is subjectively compressed. Prior research revealed the importance of tactile feedback from the keyboard on this effect. Here we examined the necessity of such tactile feedback by utilizing a touch-free key-press device without haptic feedback, and explored how initial/outcome sensory modalities (visual/auditory/tactile) and their consistency influence the intentional binding effect. Participants estimated three delay lengths (250, 550, or 850 ms) between the initial and outcome stimuli. Results showed that regardless of the combinations of sensory modalities between the initial and the outcome stimuli (i.e., modal consistency), the intentional binding effect was only observed in the 250 ms delay condition. This findings indicate a stable intentional binding effect both within and across sensory modalities, supporting the existence of a shared mechanism underlying the binding effect in touch-free voluntary actions.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40170/
Source: PubMed
Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions
Authors: Liu, J., Chen, L., Gu, J., Buidze, T., Zhao, K., Liu, C.H., Zhang, Y., Glascher, J. and Fu, X.
Journal: CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION
Volume: 123
eISSN: 1090-2376
ISSN: 1053-8100
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103727
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40170/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions.
Authors: Liu, J., Chen, L., Gu, J., Buidze, T., Zhao, K., Liu, C.H., Zhang, Y., Gläscher, J. and Fu, X.
Journal: Consciousness and cognition
Volume: 123
Pages: 103727
eISSN: 1090-2376
ISSN: 1053-8100
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103727
Abstract:The intentional binding effect refers to the phenomenon where the perceived temporal interval between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence is subjectively compressed. Prior research revealed the importance of tactile feedback from the keyboard on this effect. Here we examined the necessity of such tactile feedback by utilizing a touch-free key-press device without haptic feedback, and explored how initial/outcome sensory modalities (visual/auditory/tactile) and their consistency influence the intentional binding effect. Participants estimated three delay lengths (250, 550, or 850 ms) between the initial and outcome stimuli. Results showed that regardless of the combinations of sensory modalities between the initial and the outcome stimuli (i.e., modal consistency), the intentional binding effect was only observed in the 250 ms delay condition. This findings indicate a stable intentional binding effect both within and across sensory modalities, supporting the existence of a shared mechanism underlying the binding effect in touch-free voluntary actions.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40170/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions.
Authors: Liu, J., Chen, L., Gu, J., Buidze, T., Zhao, K., Liu, C.H., Zhang, Y., Gläscher, J. and Fu, X.
Journal: Consciousness and Cognition
Volume: 123
Abstract:The intentional binding effect refers to the phenomenon where the perceived temporal interval between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence is subjectively compressed. Prior research revealed the importance of tactile feedback from the keyboard on this effect. Here we examined the necessity of such tactile feedback by utilizing a touch-free key-press device without haptic feedback, and explored how initial/outcome sensory modalities (visual/auditory/tactile) and their consistency influence the intentional binding effect. Participants estimated three delay lengths (250, 550, or 850 ms) between the initial and outcome stimuli. Results showed that regardless of the combinations of sensory modalities between the initial and the outcome stimuli (i.e., modal consistency), the intentional binding effect was only observed in the 250 ms delay condition. This findings indicate a stable intentional binding effect both within and across sensory modalities, supporting the existence of a shared mechanism underlying the binding effect in touch-free voluntary actions.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40170/
Source: BURO EPrints