Different facets of age perception in people with developmental prosopagnosia and “super-recognisers”
Authors: Attard-Johnson, J., Dark, O., Murray, E. and Bate, S.
Journal: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
eISSN: 2365-7464
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00603-4
Abstract:The interplay between facial age and facial identity is evident from several scenarios experienced in daily life, such as when recognising a face several decades after the last exposure. However, the link between age and identity processing, and how age perception abilities might diverge in individuals with different face processing abilities, has scarcely been considered. Furthermore, the approach used to test age perception ability may also influence outcome, but the effect of different paradigms on performance is not yet known. Across three studies, we compare super-recognisers (SRs), people with developmental prosopagnosia (DPs), and a group of neurotypical controls, on three age perception paradigms. There were no differences on the numeric age estimation task (i.e. providing precise age estimates for a series of faces; Study 1), and numeric age estimation task with added noise-distortion to stimuli (Study 2). However, SRs were more accurate when instructed to classify ambient faces as either over- or under- the age of 18 compared to both DPs and controls (Study 3). Thus, there may be nuanced differences in age processing which can be tapped into using separate paradigms; however, given that the difference is only with SRs it remains unclear to what extent these are linked to facial identity processing.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40507/
Source: Scopus
Different facets of age perception in people with developmental prosopagnosia and "super-recognisers".
Authors: Attard-Johnson, J., Dark, O., Murray, E. and Bate, S.
Journal: Cogn Res Princ Implic
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 76
eISSN: 2365-7464
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00603-4
Abstract:The interplay between facial age and facial identity is evident from several scenarios experienced in daily life, such as when recognising a face several decades after the last exposure. However, the link between age and identity processing, and how age perception abilities might diverge in individuals with different face processing abilities, has scarcely been considered. Furthermore, the approach used to test age perception ability may also influence outcome, but the effect of different paradigms on performance is not yet known. Across three studies, we compare super-recognisers (SRs), people with developmental prosopagnosia (DPs), and a group of neurotypical controls, on three age perception paradigms. There were no differences on the numeric age estimation task (i.e. providing precise age estimates for a series of faces; Study 1), and numeric age estimation task with added noise-distortion to stimuli (Study 2). However, SRs were more accurate when instructed to classify ambient faces as either over- or under- the age of 18 compared to both DPs and controls (Study 3). Thus, there may be nuanced differences in age processing which can be tapped into using separate paradigms; however, given that the difference is only with SRs it remains unclear to what extent these are linked to facial identity processing.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40507/
Source: PubMed
Different facets of age perception in people with developmental prosopagnosia and "super-recognisers"
Authors: Attard-Johnson, J., Dark, O., Murray, E. and Bate, S.
Journal: COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
ISSN: 2365-7464
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00603-4
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40507/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Different Facets of Age Perception in People with Developmental Prosopagnosia and “Super-Recognisers"
Authors: Attard-Johnson, J., Dark, O., Murray, E. and Bate, S.
Journal: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Publisher: SpringerOpen
eISSN: 2365-7464
ISSN: 2365-7464
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40507/
Source: Manual
Different facets of age perception in people with developmental prosopagnosia and "super-recognisers".
Authors: Attard-Johnson, J., Dark, O., Murray, E. and Bate, S.
Journal: Cognitive research: principles and implications
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 76
eISSN: 2365-7464
ISSN: 2365-7464
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00603-4
Abstract:The interplay between facial age and facial identity is evident from several scenarios experienced in daily life, such as when recognising a face several decades after the last exposure. However, the link between age and identity processing, and how age perception abilities might diverge in individuals with different face processing abilities, has scarcely been considered. Furthermore, the approach used to test age perception ability may also influence outcome, but the effect of different paradigms on performance is not yet known. Across three studies, we compare super-recognisers (SRs), people with developmental prosopagnosia (DPs), and a group of neurotypical controls, on three age perception paradigms. There were no differences on the numeric age estimation task (i.e. providing precise age estimates for a series of faces; Study 1), and numeric age estimation task with added noise-distortion to stimuli (Study 2). However, SRs were more accurate when instructed to classify ambient faces as either over- or under- the age of 18 compared to both DPs and controls (Study 3). Thus, there may be nuanced differences in age processing which can be tapped into using separate paradigms; however, given that the difference is only with SRs it remains unclear to what extent these are linked to facial identity processing.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40507/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Different Facets of Age Perception in People with Developmental Prosopagnosia and “Super-Recognisers"
Authors: Attard-Johnson, J., Dark, O., Murray, E. and Bate, S.
Journal: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Volume: 9
Publisher: SpringerOpen
ISSN: 2365-7464
Abstract:The interplay between facial age and facial identity is evident from several scenarios experienced in daily life, such as when recognising a face several decades after the last exposure. However, the link between age and identity processing, and how age perception abilities might diverge in individuals with diferent face processing abilities, has scarcely been considered. Furthermore, the approach used to test age perception ability may also infuence outcome, but the efect of diferent paradigms on performance is not yet known. Across three studies, we compare superrecognisers (SRs), people with developmental prosopagnosia (DPs), and a group of neurotypical controls, on three age perception paradigms. There were no diferences on the numeric age estimation task (i.e. providing precise age estimates for a series of faces; Study 1), and numeric age estimation task with added noisedistortion to stimuli (Study 2). However, SRs were more accurate when instructed to classify ambient faces as either over or under the age of 18 compared to both DPs and controls (Study 3). Thus, there may be nuanced diferences in age processing which can be tapped into using separate paradigms; however, given that the diference is only with SRs it remains unclear to what extent these are linked to facial identity processing.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40507/
Source: BURO EPrints