Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals
Authors: Agyenim-Boateng, O., Rogers, C., Hancock, A. and Akudjedu, T.N.
Journal: Radiography
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
eISSN: 1532-2831
ISSN: 1078-8174
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.102949
Abstract:Introduction: Medical radiation sciences (MRS) journals serve as the gatekeepers of knowledge within our professional field. This work sought to understand these professional journals’ current levels of commitment and the operational dynamics towards the principles of Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI), which can serve as barriers to equitable access to publishing and published evidence. Methods: Seven MRS journals were purposively sampled for inclusion. Editorial statements relating to the included journals’ EDI position were identified through online searching. To ensure completeness, all editorial policies were searched for EDI-related content between May 18 to June 6, 2024. The Braun and Clarke thematic analysis methodology was employed to synthesise the statements. Results: The Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) and Radiography were the only two journals that had specific EDI statements which guide their operational practices. Alongside tipsRO, JMIRS and Radiography were also the only journals to provide recommendations and/or clear emphasis for the use of inclusive language in their author guidelines. Six key themes were established from the analysis of the two EDI statements: Commitment to Leadership and Editorial Diversity, Diversity Driving Scientific Excellence, Platforming Underrepresented Voices, Commitment to Health Equity, Disrupting Traditional Editorial Practices and Strategic Planning and Monitoring for EDI Progress. Disparity across the two journals was, however, evident. Conclusion: Whilst some best practices were evidenced, there is an opportunity across all MRS journals to improve and enhance EDI commitments. Implications for practice: Journals play a pivotal role in promoting equitable access to publishing and ensuring the dissemination of diverse perspectives that enrich scientific inquiry and practice. An EDI-friendly MRS research cycle is critical through the comprehensive adoption of regular audits and the implementation of targeted education policies.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40953/
Source: Scopus
Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals.
Authors: Agyenim-Boateng, O., Rogers, C., Hancock, A. and Akudjedu, T.N.
Journal: Radiography (Lond)
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
Pages: 102949
eISSN: 1532-2831
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.102949
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Medical radiation sciences (MRS) journals serve as the gatekeepers of knowledge within our professional field. This work sought to understand these professional journals' current levels of commitment and the operational dynamics towards the principles of Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI), which can serve as barriers to equitable access to publishing and published evidence. METHODS: Seven MRS journals were purposively sampled for inclusion. Editorial statements relating to the included journals' EDI position were identified through online searching. To ensure completeness, all editorial policies were searched for EDI-related content between May 18 to June 6, 2024. The Braun and Clarke thematic analysis methodology was employed to synthesise the statements. RESULTS: The Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) and Radiography were the only two journals that had specific EDI statements which guide their operational practices. Alongside tipsRO, JMIRS and Radiography were also the only journals to provide recommendations and/or clear emphasis for the use of inclusive language in their author guidelines. Six key themes were established from the analysis of the two EDI statements: Commitment to Leadership and Editorial Diversity, Diversity Driving Scientific Excellence, Platforming Underrepresented Voices, Commitment to Health Equity, Disrupting Traditional Editorial Practices and Strategic Planning and Monitoring for EDI Progress. Disparity across the two journals was, however, evident. CONCLUSION: Whilst some best practices were evidenced, there is an opportunity across all MRS journals to improve and enhance EDI commitments. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Journals play a pivotal role in promoting equitable access to publishing and ensuring the dissemination of diverse perspectives that enrich scientific inquiry and practice. An EDI-friendly MRS research cycle is critical through the comprehensive adoption of regular audits and the implementation of targeted education policies.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40953/
Source: PubMed
Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals
Authors: Agyenim-Boateng, O., Rogers, C., Hancock, A. and Akudjedu, T.N.
Journal: RADIOGRAPHY
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
eISSN: 1532-2831
ISSN: 1078-8174
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.102949
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40953/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals
Authors: Agyenim-Boateng, O., Rogers, C., Hancock, A. and Akudjedu, T.N.
Journal: Radiography
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
Publisher: Elsevier
eISSN: 1078-8174
ISSN: 1078-8174
Abstract:Introduction Medical radiation sciences (MRS) journals serve as the gatekeepers of knowledge within our professional field. This work sought to understand these professional journals’ current levels of commitment and the operational dynamics towards the principles of Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI), which can serve as barriers to equitable access to publishing and published evidence.
Methods Seven MRS journals were purposively sampled for inclusion. Editorial statements relating to the included journals’ EDI position were identified through online searching. To ensure completeness, all editorial policies were searched for EDI-related content between May 18 to June 6, 2024. The Braun and Clarke thematic analysis methodology was employed to synthesise the statements.
Results The Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) and Radiography were the only two journals that had specific EDI statements which guide their operational practices. Alongside tipsRO, JMIRS and Radiography were also the only journals to provide recommendations and/or clear emphasis for the use of inclusive language in their author guidelines. Six key themes were established from the analysis of the two EDI statements: Commitment to Leadership and Editorial Diversity, Diversity Driving Scientific Excellence, Platforming Underrepresented Voices, Commitment to Health Equity, Disrupting Traditional Editorial Practices and Strategic Planning and Monitoring for EDI Progress. Disparity across the two journals was, however, evident.
Conclusion Whilst some best practices were evidenced, there is an opportunity across all MRS journals to improve and enhance EDI commitments.
Implications for practice Journals play a pivotal role in promoting equitable access to publishing and ensuring the dissemination of diverse perspectives that enrich scientific inquiry and practice. An EDI-friendly MRS research cycle is critical through the comprehensive adoption of regular audits and the implementation of targeted education policies.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40953/
Source: Manual
Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals.
Authors: Agyenim-Boateng, O., Rogers, C., Hancock, A. and Akudjedu, T.N.
Journal: Radiography (London, England : 1995)
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
Pages: 102949
eISSN: 1532-2831
ISSN: 1078-8174
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.102949
Abstract:Introduction
Medical radiation sciences (MRS) journals serve as the gatekeepers of knowledge within our professional field. This work sought to understand these professional journals' current levels of commitment and the operational dynamics towards the principles of Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI), which can serve as barriers to equitable access to publishing and published evidence.Methods
Seven MRS journals were purposively sampled for inclusion. Editorial statements relating to the included journals' EDI position were identified through online searching. To ensure completeness, all editorial policies were searched for EDI-related content between May 18 to June 6, 2024. The Braun and Clarke thematic analysis methodology was employed to synthesise the statements.Results
The Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) and Radiography were the only two journals that had specific EDI statements which guide their operational practices. Alongside tipsRO, JMIRS and Radiography were also the only journals to provide recommendations and/or clear emphasis for the use of inclusive language in their author guidelines. Six key themes were established from the analysis of the two EDI statements: Commitment to Leadership and Editorial Diversity, Diversity Driving Scientific Excellence, Platforming Underrepresented Voices, Commitment to Health Equity, Disrupting Traditional Editorial Practices and Strategic Planning and Monitoring for EDI Progress. Disparity across the two journals was, however, evident.Conclusion
Whilst some best practices were evidenced, there is an opportunity across all MRS journals to improve and enhance EDI commitments.Implications for practice
Journals play a pivotal role in promoting equitable access to publishing and ensuring the dissemination of diverse perspectives that enrich scientific inquiry and practice. An EDI-friendly MRS research cycle is critical through the comprehensive adoption of regular audits and the implementation of targeted education policies.https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40953/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals
Authors: Agyenim-Boateng, O., Rogers, C., Hancock, A. and Akudjedu, T.N.
Journal: Radiography
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1078-8174
Abstract:Introduction Medical radiation sciences (MRS) journals serve as the gatekeepers of knowledge within our professional field. This work sought to understand these professional journals’ current levels of commitment and the operational dynamics towards the principles of Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI), which can serve as barriers to equitable access to publishing and published evidence.
Methods Seven MRS journals were purposively sampled for inclusion. Editorial statements relating to the included journals’ EDI position were identified through online searching. To ensure completeness, all editorial policies were searched for EDI-related content between May 18 to June 6, 2024. The Braun and Clarke thematic analysis methodology was employed to synthesise the statements.
Results The Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) and Radiography were the only two journals that had specific EDI statements which guide their operational practices. Alongside tipsRO, JMIRS and Radiography were also the only journals to provide recommendations and/or clear emphasis for the use of inclusive language in their author guidelines. Six key themes were established from the analysis of the two EDI statements: Commitment to Leadership and Editorial Diversity, Diversity Driving Scientific Excellence, Platforming Underrepresented Voices, Commitment to Health Equity, Disrupting Traditional Editorial Practices and Strategic Planning and Monitoring for EDI Progress. Disparity across the two journals was, however, evident.
Conclusion Whilst some best practices were evidenced, there is an opportunity across all MRS journals to improve and enhance EDI commitments.
Implications for practice Journals play a pivotal role in promoting equitable access to publishing and ensuring the dissemination of diverse perspectives that enrich scientific inquiry and practice. An EDI-friendly MRS research cycle is critical through the comprehensive adoption of regular audits and the implementation of targeted education policies.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/40953/
Source: BURO EPrints