Cardiovascular risk at health checks performed opportunistically or following an invitation letter. Cohort study
Authors: Gulliford, M.C., Khoshaba, B., McDermott, L., Cornelius, V., Ashworth, M., Fuller, F., Miller, J., Dodhia, H., Wright, A.J.
Journal: Journal of Public Health United Kingdom
Publication Date: 01/06/2018
Volume: 40
Issue: 2
Pages: e151-e156
eISSN: 1741-3850
ISSN: 1741-3842
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx068
Abstract:Background A population-based programme of health checks has been established in England. Participants receive postal invitations through a population-based call-recall system but health check providers may also offer health checks opportunistically. We compared cardiovascular risk scores for euro; opportunistic' health checks. Methods Cohort study of all health checks completed at 18 general practices from July 2013 to June 2015. For each general practice, cardiovascular (CVD) risk scores were compared by source of check and pooled using meta-analysis. Effect estimates were compared by gender, age-group, ethnicity and fifths of deprivation. Results There were 6184 health checks recorded (2280 invited and 3904 opportunistic) with CVD risk scores recorded for 5359 (87%) participants. There were 17.0% of invited checks and 22.2% of opportunistic health checks with CVD risk score ≥10%; a relative increment of 28% (95% confidence interval: 14-44%, P < 0.001). In the most deprived quintile, 15.3% of invited checks and 22.4% of opportunistic checks were associated with elevated CVD risk (adjusted odds ratio: 1.94, 1.37-2.74, P< 0.001). Conclusions Respondents at health checks performed opportunistically are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than those participating in response to a standard invitation letter, potentially reducing the effect of uptake inequalities.
Source: Scopus
Cardiovascular risk at health checks performed opportunistically or following an invitation letter. Cohort study.
Authors: Gulliford, M.C., Khoshaba, B., McDermott, L., Cornelius, V., Ashworth, M., Fuller, F., Miller, J., Dodhia, H., Wright, A.J.
Journal: J Public Health (Oxf)
Publication Date: 01/06/2018
Volume: 40
Issue: 2
Pages: e151-e156
eISSN: 1741-3850
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx068
Abstract:BACKGROUND: A population-based programme of health checks has been established in England. Participants receive postal invitations through a population-based call-recall system but health check providers may also offer health checks opportunistically. We compared cardiovascular risk scores for 'invited' and 'opportunistic' health checks. METHODS: Cohort study of all health checks completed at 18 general practices from July 2013 to June 2015. For each general practice, cardiovascular (CVD) risk scores were compared by source of check and pooled using meta-analysis. Effect estimates were compared by gender, age-group, ethnicity and fifths of deprivation. RESULTS: There were 6184 health checks recorded (2280 invited and 3904 opportunistic) with CVD risk scores recorded for 5359 (87%) participants. There were 17.0% of invited checks and 22.2% of opportunistic health checks with CVD risk score ≥10%; a relative increment of 28% (95% confidence interval: 14-44%, P < 0.001). In the most deprived quintile, 15.3% of invited checks and 22.4% of opportunistic checks were associated with elevated CVD risk (adjusted odds ratio: 1.94, 1.37-2.74, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents at health checks performed opportunistically are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than those participating in response to a standard invitation letter, potentially reducing the effect of uptake inequalities.
Source: PubMed
Cardiovascular risk at health checks performed opportunistically or following an invitation letter. Cohort study.
Authors: Gulliford, M.C., Khoshaba, B., McDermott, L., Cornelius, V., Ashworth, M., Fuller, F., Miller, J., Dodhia, H., Wright, A.J.
Journal: Journal of public health (Oxford, England)
Publication Date: 06/2018
Volume: 40
Issue: 2
Pages: e151-e156
eISSN: 1741-3850
ISSN: 1741-3842
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx068
Abstract:Background
A population-based programme of health checks has been established in England. Participants receive postal invitations through a population-based call-recall system but health check providers may also offer health checks opportunistically. We compared cardiovascular risk scores for 'invited' and 'opportunistic' health checks.Methods
Cohort study of all health checks completed at 18 general practices from July 2013 to June 2015. For each general practice, cardiovascular (CVD) risk scores were compared by source of check and pooled using meta-analysis. Effect estimates were compared by gender, age-group, ethnicity and fifths of deprivation.Results
There were 6184 health checks recorded (2280 invited and 3904 opportunistic) with CVD risk scores recorded for 5359 (87%) participants. There were 17.0% of invited checks and 22.2% of opportunistic health checks with CVD risk score ≥10%; a relative increment of 28% (95% confidence interval: 14-44%, P < 0.001). In the most deprived quintile, 15.3% of invited checks and 22.4% of opportunistic checks were associated with elevated CVD risk (adjusted odds ratio: 1.94, 1.37-2.74, P < 0.001).Conclusions
Respondents at health checks performed opportunistically are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than those participating in response to a standard invitation letter, potentially reducing the effect of uptake inequalities.Source: Europe PubMed Central