"You feel so hopeless": A qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain
Authors: Breen, A., Austin, H., Campion-Smith, C., Carr, E. and Mann, E.
Journal: European Journal of Pain
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 21
eISSN: 1532-2149
ISSN: 1090-3801
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.006
Abstract:Background: Biopsychosocial management of non-specific back pain in general practice has been problematical, with frequent inappropriate referral for imaging and secondary care interventions and lack of self-confidence in the ability to provide evidence-based care. Aims: To examine GP attitudes to managing back pain as a biopsychosocial problem in order to inform future educational strategies that may improve practice. Methods: Twenty-one GPs from separate practices within the Dorset and Somerset Strategic Health Authority area (UK) participated in telephone interviews leading to the development of vignettes to refine the theoretical framework for subsequent focus group interviews about evidence-based back pain management. Transcripts were analysed thematically. Results: There were 5 main emergent themes. These were generally negative and dominated by concerns about doctor-patient interaction. They included feelings of frustration, mismatches of perceptions in the doctor-patient relationship, problems in relation to time, challenges and discord between stakeholders in the process (for example, over sickness certification) and a lack of resources for education, awareness and local services to refer to. Psychosocial aspects of the actual care process were rarely raised. Participants favoured education that is multidisciplinary, in small group format and involves the participation of patients. Conclusions: This study illustrates the difficulties that GPs may have in applying the relevant evidence for the successful management of back pain. A desire to avoid conflict in the relationship with patients explained much of the problem of implementing evidence in general practice. This indicates a need for insightful educational strategies that involve active GP participation. © 2006 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain.
Source: Scopus
"You feel so hopeless": a qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain.
Authors: Breen, A., Austin, H., Campion-Smith, C., Carr, E. and Mann, E.
Journal: Eur J Pain
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 21-29
ISSN: 1090-3801
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.006
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Biopsychosocial management of non-specific back pain in general practice has been problematical, with frequent inappropriate referral for imaging and secondary care interventions and lack of self-confidence in the ability to provide evidence-based care. AIMS: To examine GP attitudes to managing back pain as a biopsychosocial problem in order to inform future educational strategies that may improve practice. METHODS: Twenty-one GPs from separate practices within the Dorset and Somerset Strategic Health Authority area (UK) participated in telephone interviews leading to the development of vignettes to refine the theoretical framework for subsequent focus group interviews about evidence-based back pain management. Transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS: There were 5 main emergent themes. These were generally negative and dominated by concerns about doctor-patient interaction. They included feelings of frustration, mismatches of perceptions in the doctor-patient relationship, problems in relation to time, challenges and discord between stakeholders in the process (for example, over sickness certification) and a lack of resources for education, awareness and local services to refer to. Psychosocial aspects of the actual care process were rarely raised. Participants favoured education that is multidisciplinary, in small group format and involves the participation of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the difficulties that GPs may have in applying the relevant evidence for the successful management of back pain. A desire to avoid conflict in the relationship with patients explained much of the problem of implementing evidence in general practice. This indicates a need for insightful educational strategies that involve active GP participation.
Source: PubMed
"You feel so hopeless": A qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain
Authors: Breen, A., Austin, H., Campion-Smith, C., Carr, E. and Mann, E.
Journal: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 21-29
eISSN: 1532-2149
ISSN: 1090-3801
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.006
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
"You feel so hopeless": a qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain
Authors: Austin, H., Breen, A.C., Campion-Smith, C., Carr, E.C.J. and Mann, E.
Journal: European Journal of Pain
Volume: 11
Pages: 21-29
ISSN: 1090-3801
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.006
Abstract:Background Biopsychosocial management of non-specific back pain in general practice has been problematical, with frequent inappropriate referral for imaging and secondary care interventions and lack of self-confidence in the ability to provide evidence-based care.
Aims To examine GP attitudes to managing back pain as a biopsychosocial problem in order to inform future educational strategies that may improve practice.
Methods Twenty-one GPs from separate practices within the Dorset and Somerset Strategic Health Authority area (UK) participated in telephone interviews leading to the development of vignettes to refine the theoretical framework for subsequent focus group interviews about evidence-based back pain management. Transcripts were analysed thematically.
Results There were 5 main emergent themes. These were generally negative and dominated by concerns about doctor–patient interaction. They included feelings of frustration, mismatches of perceptions in the doctor–patient relationship, problems in relation to time, challenges and discord between stakeholders in the process (for example, over sickness certification) and a lack of resources for education, awareness and local services to refer to. Psychosocial aspects of the actual care process were rarely raised. Participants favoured education that is multidisciplinary, in small group format and involves the participation of patients.
Conclusions This study illustrates the difficulties that GPs may have in applying the relevant evidence for the successful management of back pain. A desire to avoid conflict in the relationship with patients explained much of the problem of implementing evidence in general practice. This indicates a need for insightful educational strategies that involve active GP participation.
Keywords: Back pain; General practice; Biopsychosocial model; Qualitative research
Source: Manual
"You feel so hopeless": a qualitative study of GP management of acute back pain.
Authors: Breen, A., Austin, H., Campion-Smith, C., Carr, E. and Mann, E.
Journal: European journal of pain (London, England)
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 21-29
eISSN: 1532-2149
ISSN: 1090-3801
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.006
Abstract:Background
Biopsychosocial management of non-specific back pain in general practice has been problematical, with frequent inappropriate referral for imaging and secondary care interventions and lack of self-confidence in the ability to provide evidence-based care.Aims
To examine GP attitudes to managing back pain as a biopsychosocial problem in order to inform future educational strategies that may improve practice.Methods
Twenty-one GPs from separate practices within the Dorset and Somerset Strategic Health Authority area (UK) participated in telephone interviews leading to the development of vignettes to refine the theoretical framework for subsequent focus group interviews about evidence-based back pain management. Transcripts were analysed thematically.Results
There were 5 main emergent themes. These were generally negative and dominated by concerns about doctor-patient interaction. They included feelings of frustration, mismatches of perceptions in the doctor-patient relationship, problems in relation to time, challenges and discord between stakeholders in the process (for example, over sickness certification) and a lack of resources for education, awareness and local services to refer to. Psychosocial aspects of the actual care process were rarely raised. Participants favoured education that is multidisciplinary, in small group format and involves the participation of patients.Conclusions
This study illustrates the difficulties that GPs may have in applying the relevant evidence for the successful management of back pain. A desire to avoid conflict in the relationship with patients explained much of the problem of implementing evidence in general practice. This indicates a need for insightful educational strategies that involve active GP participation.Source: Europe PubMed Central