Information in diabetes care: Is there a need to dumb down even more?
Authors: Kerr, D.
Journal: Diabetic Medicine
Volume: 24
Issue: 5
Pages: 561-563
eISSN: 1464-5491
ISSN: 0742-3071
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02135.x
Abstract:Aim: To assess readability of information provided for patients with Type 2 diabetes on drug treatment for their condition. Methods: A random sample of patient information on drug treatments published on the website of the main UK Diabetes charity was assessed for readability using two accepted measures and compared with articles from three national newspapers published the same day, in the setting of a hospital-based diabetes centre. The main outcome measures were Flesch-Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores available within Microsoft Office 2000. Results: Information provided for patients and medically related articles from two of three newspapers had suboptimal readability, requiring literacy skills well above the UK average. Conclusions: Information for patients with diabetes may be of limited value for 20% of the UK adult population who have problems with literacy. © 2007 The Author.
Source: Scopus
Information in diabetes care: is there a need to dumb down even more?
Authors: Kerr, D.
Journal: Diabet Med
Volume: 24
Issue: 5
Pages: 561-563
ISSN: 0742-3071
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02135.x
Abstract:AIM: To assess readability of information provided for patients with Type 2 diabetes on drug treatment for their condition. METHODS: A random sample of patient information on drug treatments published on the website of the main UK Diabetes charity was assessed for readability using two accepted measures and compared with articles from three national newspapers published the same day, in the setting of a hospital-based diabetes centre. The main outcome measures were Flesch-Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores available within Microsoft Office 2000. RESULTS: Information provided for patients and medically related articles from two of three newspapers had suboptimal readability, requiring literacy skills well above the UK average. CONCLUSIONS: Information for patients with diabetes may be of limited value for 20% of the UK adult population who have problems with literacy.
Source: PubMed
Information in diabetes care: is there a need to dumb down even more?
Authors: Kerr, D.
Journal: DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume: 24
Issue: 5
Pages: 561-563
ISSN: 0742-3071
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02135.x
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Information in diabetes care: is there a need to dumb down even more?
Authors: Kerr, D.
Journal: Diabetic Medicine
Volume: 24
Pages: 561-563
ISSN: 0742-3071
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02135.x
Abstract:Aim To assess readability of information provided for patients with Type 2 diabetes on drug treatment for their condition.
Methods A random sample of patient information on drug treatments published on the website of the main UK Diabetes charity was assessed for readability using two accepted measures and compared with articles from three national newspapers published the same day, in the setting of a hospital-based diabetes centre. The main outcome measures were Flesch-Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores available within Microsoft Office 2000.
Results Information provided for patients and medically related articles from two of three newspapers had suboptimal readability, requiring literacy skills well above the UK average.
Conclusions Information for patients with diabetes may be of limited value for 20% of the UK adult population who have problems with literacy.
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02135.x
Source: Manual
Preferred by: David Kerr
Information in diabetes care: is there a need to dumb down even more?
Authors: Kerr, D.
Journal: Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association
Volume: 24
Issue: 5
Pages: 561-563
eISSN: 1464-5491
ISSN: 0742-3071
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02135.x
Abstract:Aim
To assess readability of information provided for patients with Type 2 diabetes on drug treatment for their condition.Methods
A random sample of patient information on drug treatments published on the website of the main UK Diabetes charity was assessed for readability using two accepted measures and compared with articles from three national newspapers published the same day, in the setting of a hospital-based diabetes centre. The main outcome measures were Flesch-Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores available within Microsoft Office 2000.Results
Information provided for patients and medically related articles from two of three newspapers had suboptimal readability, requiring literacy skills well above the UK average.Conclusions
Information for patients with diabetes may be of limited value for 20% of the UK adult population who have problems with literacy.Source: Europe PubMed Central