The ancillary-care responsibilities of researchers: Reasonable but not great expectations

This source preferred by Roger Brownsword

Authors: Brownsword, R.

Editors: Harrington, J. and Stuttaford, M.

Pages: 81-101

Publisher: Routledge

ISBN: 9780415479387

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Brownsword, R.

Volume: 35

DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00190.x

This paper argues that, in a community of rights, the prima facie responsibilities of researchers to attend to the ancillary-care needs of their participants would be determined by a four-stage test (relating to placement, capacity, reasonable imposition, and fair demand). This test, it is suggested, sets a standard (and an example) for common law courts that are invited to recognize the ancillary-care responsibilities of researchers, whether as a matter of contract or tort law. © 2007 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

The data on this page was last updated at 05:10 on February 18, 2020.