Comparison of theoretical and practical performances with 802.11N and 802.11Ac wireless networking
Authors: Newell, D., Davies, P., Wade, R., De Caux, P. and Shama, M.
Journal: Proceedings - 31st IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, WAINA 2017
Pages: 710-715
ISBN: 9781509062300
DOI: 10.1109/WAINA.2017.113
Abstract:This work explores the theoretical and practical performances of the two most recent IEEE standards, 802.11n and 802.11ac. Experiments were conducted to measure data rates to characterize performance effects of distance and interference between different channels. We conclude that the majority of test cases show 802.11ac achieved higher data rates than its predecessor, as expected. However, performance of 802.11ac decreased at a significantly faster rate with increasing distance from client to AP when compared to the decreasing performance experienced with 802.11n. Furthermore, 802.11n consistently achieved real data rates much closer to the theoretical data rate than did 802.11ac.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29495/
Source: Scopus
Comparison of Theoretical and Practical Performances with 802.11n and 802.11ac Wireless Networking
Authors: Newell, D., Davies, P., Wade, R., deCaux, P. and Shama, M.
Journal: 2017 31ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOPS (IEEE WAINA 2017)
Pages: 710-715
DOI: 10.1109/WAINA.2017.113
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29495/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Comparison of theoretical and practical performances with 802.11N and 802.11Ac wireless networking
Authors: Newell, D., Davies, P., Wade, R., De Caux, P. and Shama, M.
Conference: IEEE WAINA 2017 2017 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops
Pages: 710-715
ISBN: 9781509062300
Abstract:This work explores the theoretical and practical performances of the two most recent IEEE standards, 802.11n and 802.11ac. Experiments were conducted to measure data rates to characterize performance effects of distance and interference between different channels. We conclude that the majority of test cases show 802.11ac achieved higher data rates than its predecessor, as expected. However, performance of 802.11ac decreased at a significantly faster rate with increasing distance from client to AP when compared to the decreasing performance experienced with 802.11n. Furthermore, 802.11n consistently achieved real data rates much closer to the theoretical data rate than did 802.11ac.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29495/
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7929496
Source: BURO EPrints