Mobilising young citizens in the UK: A content analysis of youth and issue websites

This source preferred by Roman Gerodimos

Authors: Gerodimos, R.

Start date: 20 September 2006

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Gerodimos, R.

Journal: Information Communication and Society

Volume: 11

Issue: 7

Pages: 964-988

eISSN: 1468-4462

ISSN: 1369-118X

DOI: 10.1080/13691180802109014

This article reviews recent thinking and practice on the issue of youth mobilization in the United Kingdom. Developing young people's sense of civic efficacy has been shown to be the key to facilitating civic engagement. However, different approaches and online mobilization strategies have been adopted by top-down government or parliament-supported projects, and by non-governmental or 'issue' organizations. To address the question of whether UK mobilization sites are making the most of the internet to facilitate youth efficacy 20 youth and issue mobilization websites were analysed looking at content, design and interactivity. The study found that most top-down youth sites, such as youth parliaments and forums, lacked appealing, relevant content and a clear purpose; their aim was to generically 'involve' young people without a set of specific reasons and benefits that would motivate young users. Youth portals were an exception to the rule as they provided users with comprehensive, accessible and relevant information and tools. NGO sites were much more empowering and strategic in their agenda and reach, with slick, comprehensive and appealing pages, although quite focused on citizens already engaged with the issues. Overall, the study finds clear signs of a move towards the politics of everyday life and the model of the citizen-consumer. Political organizations providing promotional material, participation tools and practical tips that link to young visitors' lifeworld are more likely to succeed in boosting their sense of efficacy. However, that raises important questions about the gravitas of such online activities in traditional political terms. © 2008 Taylor & Francis.

The data on this page was last updated at 05:24 on October 24, 2020.