Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition
Authors: Collin, C.A., Liu, C.H., McMullen, P.A., Troje, N.F. and Chaudhuri, A.
Journal: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume: 30
Issue: 5
Pages: 975-987
ISSN: 0096-1523
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.975
Abstract:Previous studies have suggested that face identification is more sensitive to variations in spatial frequency content than object recognition, but none have compared how sensitive the 2 processes are to variations in spatial frequency overlap (SFO). The authors tested face and object matching accuracy under varying SFO conditions. Their results showed that object recognition was more robust to SFO variations than face recognition and that the vulnerability of faces was not due to reliance on configural processing. They suggest that variations in sensitivity to SFO help explain the vulnerability of face recognition to changes in image format and the lack of a middle-frequency advantage in object recognition.
Source: Scopus
Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition.
Authors: Collin, C.A., Liu, C.H., Troje, N.F., McMullen, P.A. and Chaudhuri, A.
Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
Volume: 30
Issue: 5
Pages: 975-987
ISSN: 0096-1523
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.975
Abstract:Previous studies have suggested that face identification is more sensitive to variations in spatial frequency content than object recognition, but none have compared how sensitive the 2 processes are to variations in spatial frequency overlap (SFO). The authors tested face and object matching accuracy under varying SFO conditions. Their results showed that object recognition was more robust to SFO variations than face recognition and that the vulnerability of faces was not due to reliance on configural processing. They suggest that variations in sensitivity to SFO help explain the vulnerability of face recognition to changes in image format and the lack of a middle-frequency advantage in object recognition.
Source: PubMed
Preferred by: Changhong Liu
Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition
Authors: Collin, C.A., Liu, C.H., Troje, N.F., McMullen, P.A. and Chaudhuri, A.
Journal: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
Volume: 30
Issue: 5
Pages: 975-987
eISSN: 1939-1277
ISSN: 0096-1523
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.975
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition.
Authors: Collin, C.A., Liu, C.H., Troje, N.F., McMullen, P.A. and Chaudhuri, A.
Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
Volume: 30
Issue: 5
Pages: 975-987
eISSN: 1939-1277
ISSN: 0096-1523
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.975
Abstract:Previous studies have suggested that face identification is more sensitive to variations in spatial frequency content than object recognition, but none have compared how sensitive the 2 processes are to variations in spatial frequency overlap (SFO). The authors tested face and object matching accuracy under varying SFO conditions. Their results showed that object recognition was more robust to SFO variations than face recognition and that the vulnerability of faces was not due to reliance on configural processing. They suggest that variations in sensitivity to SFO help explain the vulnerability of face recognition to changes in image format and the lack of a middle-frequency advantage in object recognition.
Source: Europe PubMed Central