A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery
Authors: Jones, E.L., Wainwright, T.W., Foster, J.D., Smith, J.R.A., Middleton, R.G. and Francis, N.K.
Journal: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Volume: 96
Issue: 2
Pages: 89-94
ISSN: 0035-8843
DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13824511649571
Abstract:Introduction: Orthopaedic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) providers are encouraged to estimate the actual benefi t of ERAS according to the patient's opinion by using patient generated data alongside traditional measures such as length of stay. The aim of this paper was to systemically review the literature on the use of patient generated information in orthopaedic ERAS across the whole perioperative pathway. Methods: Publications were identifi ed using Embase™, MEDLINE®, AMED, CINAHL® (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), the Cochrane Library and the British Nursing Index. Search terms related to experiences, acceptance, satisfaction or perception of ERAS and quality of life (QoL). FINDINGS Of the 596 abstracts found, 8 papers were identifi ed that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,208 patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty were included. Patient satisfaction was reported in 6 papers. Scores were high in all patients and not adversely affected by length of stay. QoL was reported in 2 papers and showed that QoL scores continued to increase up to 12 months following ERAS. Qualitative methods were used in one study, which highlighted problems with support following discharge. There is a paucity of data reporting on patient experience in orthopaedic ERAS. However, ERAS does not compromise patient satisfaction or QoL after elective hip or knee surgery. The measurement of patient experience should be standardised with further research.
Source: Scopus
A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery.
Authors: Jones, E.L., Wainwright, T.W., Foster, J.D., Smith, J.R.A., Middleton, R.G. and Francis, N.K.
Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Volume: 96
Issue: 2
Pages: 89-94
eISSN: 1478-7083
DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13824511649571
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) providers are encouraged to estimate the actual benefit of ERAS according to the patient's opinion by using patient generated data alongside traditional measures such as length of stay. The aim of this paper was to systemically review the literature on the use of patient generated information in orthopaedic ERAS across the whole perioperative pathway. METHODS: Publications were identified using Embase(™), MEDLINE(®), AMED, CINAHL(®) (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), the Cochrane Library and the British Nursing Index. Search terms related to experiences, acceptance, satisfaction or perception of ERAS and quality of life (QoL). FINDINGS: Of the 596 abstracts found, 8 papers were identified that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,208 patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty were included. Patient satisfaction was reported in 6 papers. Scores were high in all patients and not adversely affected by length of stay. QoL was reported in 2 papers and showed that QoL scores continued to increase up to 12 months following ERAS. Qualitative methods were used in one study, which highlighted problems with support following discharge. There is a paucity of data reporting on patient experience in orthopaedic ERAS. However, ERAS does not compromise patient satisfaction or QoL after elective hip or knee surgery. The measurement of patient experience should be standardised with further research.
Source: PubMed
A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery
Authors: Jones, E.L., Wainwright, T.W., Foster, J.D., Smith, J.R.A., Middleton, R.G. and Francis, N.K.
Journal: ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND
Volume: 96
Issue: 2
Pages: 89-94
eISSN: 1478-7083
ISSN: 0035-8843
DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13824511649571
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery
Authors: Jones, E.L., Wainwright, T.W., Foster, J.D., Smith, J.R.A., Middleton, R.G. and Francis, N.K.
Journal: Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
Volume: 96
Issue: 2
Pages: 89-94
DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13824511649571
Abstract:Introduction
Orthopaedic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) providers are encouraged to estimate the actual benefit of ERAS according to the patient’s opinion by using patient generated data alongside traditional measures such as length of stay. The aim of this paper was to systemically review the literature on the use of patient generated information in orthopaedic ERAS across the whole perioperative pathway.
Methods
Publications were identified using Embase™, MEDLINE®, AMED, CINAHL® (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), the Cochrane Library and the British Nursing Index. Search terms related to experiences, acceptance, satisfaction or perception of ERAS and quality of life (QoL).
Findings
Of the 596 abstracts found, 8 papers were identified that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,208 patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty were included. Patient satisfaction was reported in 6 papers. Scores were high in all patients and not adversely affected by length of stay. QoL was reported in 2 papers and showed that QoL scores continued to increase up to 12 months following ERAS. Qualitative methods were used in one study, which highlighted problems with support following discharge. There is a paucity of data reporting on patient experience in orthopaedic ERAS. However, ERAS does not compromise patient satisfaction or QoL after elective hip or knee surgery. The measurement of patient experience should be standardised with further research.
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Rob Middleton and Tom Wainwright
A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery.
Authors: Jones, E.L., Wainwright, T.W., Foster, J.D., Smith, J.R.A., Middleton, R.G. and Francis, N.K.
Journal: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Volume: 96
Issue: 2
Pages: 89-94
eISSN: 1478-7083
ISSN: 0035-8843
DOI: 10.1308/003588414x13824511649571
Abstract:Introduction
Orthopaedic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) providers are encouraged to estimate the actual benefit of ERAS according to the patient's opinion by using patient generated data alongside traditional measures such as length of stay. The aim of this paper was to systemically review the literature on the use of patient generated information in orthopaedic ERAS across the whole perioperative pathway.Methods
Publications were identified using Embase(™), MEDLINE(®), AMED, CINAHL(®) (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), the Cochrane Library and the British Nursing Index. Search terms related to experiences, acceptance, satisfaction or perception of ERAS and quality of life (QoL).Findings
Of the 596 abstracts found, 8 papers were identified that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2,208 patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty were included. Patient satisfaction was reported in 6 papers. Scores were high in all patients and not adversely affected by length of stay. QoL was reported in 2 papers and showed that QoL scores continued to increase up to 12 months following ERAS. Qualitative methods were used in one study, which highlighted problems with support following discharge. There is a paucity of data reporting on patient experience in orthopaedic ERAS. However, ERAS does not compromise patient satisfaction or QoL after elective hip or knee surgery. The measurement of patient experience should be standardised with further research.Source: Europe PubMed Central