Intellectual property enclosure and economic discourse in the 2012 London Olympic Games
Authors: Erickson, K. and Wei, L.
Journal: Media, Culture and Society
Volume: 37
Issue: 3
Pages: 409-421
eISSN: 1460-3675
ISSN: 0163-4437
DOI: 10.1177/0163443714567022
Abstract:Special legislation associated with mega sporting events has enabled new forms of cultural enclosure, effectively commoditising aspects of cultural expression that previously remained in the public domain. In this article, the authors examine the tension between economic and political justifications for hosting the Olympics and the intellectual property enclosures that are imposed upon host nations. These enclosures extend beyond what is traditionally protected under trade mark law, to include ‘generic’ terms. Enabling market competitors to freely use generic, descriptive language is a core doctrine of trade mark law, seeking to balance monopoly IP rights with free market competition. The authors evaluate the impact of special legislative enclosures on the public interest, and argue that collective access to expression should be more carefully considered in political and economic calculations of the value of the Olympics.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/23202/
Source: Scopus
Intellectual property enclosure and economic discourse in the 2012 London Olympic Games
Authors: Erickson, K. and Wei, L.
Journal: MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETY
Volume: 37
Issue: 3
Pages: 409-421
eISSN: 1460-3675
ISSN: 0163-4437
DOI: 10.1177/0163443714567022
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/23202/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
Intellectual property enclosure and economic discourse in the 2012 London Olympic Games.
Authors: Erickson, K. and Wei, L.
Journal: Media, Culture and Society
Volume: 37
Issue: 3
Pages: 409-421
ISSN: 0163-4437
Abstract:Special legislation associated with mega sporting events has enabled new forms of cultural enclosure, effectively commoditising aspects of cultural expression that previously remained in the public domain. In this article, the authors examine the tension between economic and political justifications for hosting the Olympics and the intellectual property enclosures that are imposed upon host nations. These enclosures extend beyond what is traditionally protected under trade mark law, to include ‘generic’ terms. Enabling market competitors to freely use generic, descriptive language is a core doctrine of trade mark law, seeking to balance monopoly IP rights with free market competition. The authors evaluate the impact of special legislative enclosures on the public interest, and argue that collective access to expression should be more carefully considered in political and economic calculations of the value of the Olympics.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/23202/
Source: BURO EPrints