Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries

Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.

Volume: 232

Pages: 207-216

eISSN: 1875-7855

ISSN: 0079-6123

DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005

Abstract:

Hardy et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large-scale, multisource, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of super-elite (SE) and a group of elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Elite Performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative Approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/

Source: Scopus

Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries.

Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.

Journal: Prog Brain Res

Volume: 232

Pages: 207-216

eISSN: 1875-7855

DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005

Abstract:

Hardy et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large-scale, multisource, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of super-elite (SE) and a group of elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Elite Performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative Approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/

Source: PubMed

Preferred by: Tim Rees

Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries

Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.

Journal: SPORT AND THE BRAIN: THE SCIENCE OF PREPARING, ENDURING AND WINNING, PT A

Volume: 232

Pages: 207-216

ISSN: 0079-6123

DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries

Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.

Editors: Wilson, M., Walsh, V. and Parkin, B.

Journal: Progress in Brain Research

Pages: 207-216

ISSN: 1875-7855

DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/

Source: Manual

Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries.

Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.

Journal: Progress in brain research

Volume: 232

Pages: 207-216

eISSN: 1875-7855

ISSN: 0079-6123

DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.005

Abstract:

Hardy et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large-scale, multisource, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of super-elite (SE) and a group of elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Elite Performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative Approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/

Source: Europe PubMed Central

Great British medalists: Response to the commentaries

Authors: Hardy, L., Barlow, M., Evans, L., Rees, T., Woodman, T. and Warr, C.

Editors: Wilson, M., Walsh, V. and Parkin, B.

Pages: 207-216

Publisher: Progress in Brain Research 232

ISSN: 1875-7855

Abstract:

Hardy, Barlow, Evans et al. (2017) reported the findings of a large scale, multi- source, qualitative study that examined the commonalities of, and discriminators between, a group of Super-Elite (SE) and a group of Elite (E) athletes who were matched on gender, sport, discipline, and era. Fifteen research teams who are actively engaged in research in the domain then provided critical commentaries on the target paper. In our response to these commentaries, we briefly remind the reader of the primary findings of the original paper, and then deal with the commentaries under the subheadings: Necessary and Sufficient conditions for elite performance; Mediating and Moderating Variables; Methodological Issues; Omissions; and Alternative approaches. Finally, we discuss the very small number of disagreements that we have with any of the commentaries.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/26877/

Source: BURO EPrints