GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study.
Authors: Cheshire, A., Hughes, J., Lewith, G., Panagioti, M., Peters, D., Simon, C. and Ridge, D.
Journal: Br J Gen Pract
Volume: 67
Issue: 663
Pages: e709-e715
eISSN: 1478-5242
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692561
Abstract:BACKGROUND: GPs are reporting increasing levels of burnout, stress, and job dissatisfaction, and there is a looming GP shortage. Promoting resilience is a key strategy for enhancing the sustainability of the healthcare workforce and improving patient care. AIM: To explore GPs' perspectives on the content, context, and acceptability of resilience training programmes in general practice, in order to build more effective GP resilience programmes. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a qualitative study of the perspectives of GPs currently practising in England. METHOD: GPs were recruited through convenience sampling, and data were collected from two focus groups (n = 15) and one-to-one telephone interviews (n = 7). A semi-structured interview approach was used and data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants perceived resilience training to be potentially of value in ameliorating workplace stresses. Nevertheless, uncertainty was expressed regarding how best to provide training for stressed GPs who have limited time. Participants suspected that GPs most likely to benefit from resilience training were the least likely to engage, as stress and being busy worked against engagement. Conflicting views were expressed about the most suitable training delivery method for promoting better engagement. Participants also emphasised that training should not only place the focus on the individual, but also focus on organisation issues. CONCLUSION: A multimodal, flexible approach based on individual needs and learning aims, including resilience workshops within undergraduate training and in individual practices, is likely to be the optimal way to promote resilience.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30721/
Source: PubMed
GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study
Authors: Cheshire, A., Hughes, J., Lewith, G., Panagioti, M., Peters, D., Simon, C. and Ridge, D.
Journal: BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume: 67
Issue: 663
Pages: E709-E715
eISSN: 1478-5242
ISSN: 0960-1643
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692561
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30721/
Source: Web of Science (Lite)
GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study
Authors: Cheshire, A., Hughes, J., Lewith, G., Panagioti, M., Peters, D., Simon, C. and Ridge, D.
Journal: BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume: 67
Issue: 663
Pages: E709-E715
eISSN: 1478-5242
ISSN: 0960-1643
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X692561
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30721/
Source: Manual
GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study.
Authors: Cheshire, A., Hughes, J., Lewith, G., Panagioti, M., Peters, D., Simon, C. and Ridge, D.
Journal: The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
Volume: 67
Issue: 663
Pages: e709-e715
eISSN: 1478-5242
ISSN: 0960-1643
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17x692561
Abstract:Background
GPs are reporting increasing levels of burnout, stress, and job dissatisfaction, and there is a looming GP shortage. Promoting resilience is a key strategy for enhancing the sustainability of the healthcare workforce and improving patient care.Aim
To explore GPs' perspectives on the content, context, and acceptability of resilience training programmes in general practice, in order to build more effective GP resilience programmes.Design and setting
This was a qualitative study of the perspectives of GPs currently practising in England.Method
GPs were recruited through convenience sampling, and data were collected from two focus groups (n = 15) and one-to-one telephone interviews (n = 7). A semi-structured interview approach was used and data were analysed using thematic analysis.Results
Participants perceived resilience training to be potentially of value in ameliorating workplace stresses. Nevertheless, uncertainty was expressed regarding how best to provide training for stressed GPs who have limited time. Participants suspected that GPs most likely to benefit from resilience training were the least likely to engage, as stress and being busy worked against engagement. Conflicting views were expressed about the most suitable training delivery method for promoting better engagement. Participants also emphasised that training should not only place the focus on the individual, but also focus on organisation issues.Conclusion
A multimodal, flexible approach based on individual needs and learning aims, including resilience workshops within undergraduate training and in individual practices, is likely to be the optimal way to promote resilience.https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30721/
Source: Europe PubMed Central
GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study.
Authors: Cheshire, A., Hughes, J., Lewith, G., Panagioti, M., Peters, D., Simon, C. and Ridge, D.
Journal: British Journal of General Practice
Volume: 67
Issue: 663
Pages: e709-e715
ISSN: 0960-1643
Abstract:BACKGROUND: GPs are reporting increasing levels of burnout, stress, and job dissatisfaction, and there is a looming GP shortage. Promoting resilience is a key strategy for enhancing the sustainability of the healthcare workforce and improving patient care. AIM: To explore GPs' perspectives on the content, context, and acceptability of resilience training programmes in general practice, in order to build more effective GP resilience programmes. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a qualitative study of the perspectives of GPs currently practising in England. METHOD: GPs were recruited through convenience sampling, and data were collected from two focus groups (n = 15) and one-to-one telephone interviews (n = 7). A semi-structured interview approach was used and data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants perceived resilience training to be potentially of value in ameliorating workplace stresses. Nevertheless, uncertainty was expressed regarding how best to provide training for stressed GPs who have limited time. Participants suspected that GPs most likely to benefit from resilience training were the least likely to engage, as stress and being busy worked against engagement. Conflicting views were expressed about the most suitable training delivery method for promoting better engagement. Participants also emphasised that training should not only place the focus on the individual, but also focus on organisation issues. CONCLUSION: A multimodal, flexible approach based on individual needs and learning aims, including resilience workshops within undergraduate training and in individual practices, is likely to be the optimal way to promote resilience.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30721/
Source: BURO EPrints