Testing times ahead: Non-invasive prenatal testing and the kind of community we want to be

Authors: Brownsword, R. and Wale, J.

Editors: Applin, T.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30994/

http://www.modernlawreview.co.uk/july-2018/testing-times-ahead-non%E2%80%90invasive-prenatal-testing-kind-community-want/

Journal: Modern Law Review

Volume: 81

Issue: 4

Pages: 646-672

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Inc.

ISSN: 0026-7961

DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12355

This article reviews the Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ report on Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT); and introduces two general questions provoked by the report – concerning, respectively, the nature and extent of the informational interests that are to be recognised in today's ‘information societies’ and the membership of today's ‘genetic societies’. The article also considers the role and nature of the Nuffield Council. While the Council's report identifies a range of individual and collective interests that are relevant to determining the legitimate uses of NIPT, we argue that it should put these interests into an order of importance; we sketch how this might be done; and we suggest that, failing such a prioritisation of interests, the Council should present its reflections in a way that engages public debate around a number of options rather than making firm recommendations

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Brownsword, R. and Wale, J.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30994/

Journal: Modern Law Review

Volume: 81

Issue: 4

Pages: 646-672

eISSN: 1468-2230

ISSN: 0026-7961

© 2018 The Author. This article reviews the Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ report on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT); and introduces two general questions provoked by the report – concerning, respectively, the nature and extent of the informational interests that are to be recognised in today’s ‘information societies’ and the membership of today’s ‘genetic societies’. The article also considers the role and nature of the Nuffield Council. While the Council’s report identifies a range of individual and collective interests that are relevant to determining the legitimate uses of NIPT, we argue that it should put these interests into an order of importance; we sketch how this might be done; and we suggest that, failing such a prioritisation of interests, the Council should present its reflections in a way that engages public debate around a number of options rather than making firm recommendations.

This data was imported from Web of Science (Lite):

Authors: Brownsword, R. and Wale, J.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/30994/

Journal: MODERN LAW REVIEW

Volume: 81

Issue: 4

Pages: 646-672

eISSN: 1468-2230

ISSN: 0026-7961

DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12355

The data on this page was last updated at 05:16 on February 19, 2020.