The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing research

This data was imported from PubMed:

Authors: Corry, M., Porter, S. and McKenna, H.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31622/

Journal: Nurs Philos

Volume: 20

Issue: 1

Pages: e12230

eISSN: 1466-769X

DOI: 10.1111/nup.12230

New nursing researchers are faced with a smorgasbord of competing methodologies. Sometimes, they are encouraged to adopt the research paradigms beloved of their senior colleagues. This is a problem if those paradigms are no longer of contemporary methodological relevance. The aim of this paper was to provide clarity about current research paradigms. It seeks to interrogate the continuing viability of positivism as a guiding paradigm for nursing research. It does this by critically analysing the methodological literature. Five major paradigms are addressed: the positivist; the interpretivist/constructivist; the transformative; the realist; and the postpositivist. Acceptance of interpretivist, transformative or realist approaches necessarily entails wholesale rejection of positivism, while acceptance of postpositivism involves its partial rejection. Postpositivism has superseded positivism as the guiding paradigm of the scientific method. The incorporation in randomized controlled trials of postpositivist assumptions indicates that even on the methodological territory that it once claimed as its own, positivism has been rendered redundant as an appropriate paradigm for contemporary nursing research.

This data was imported from Scopus:

Authors: Corry, M., Porter, S. and McKenna, H.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31622/

Journal: Nursing Philosophy

Volume: 20

Issue: 1

eISSN: 1466-769X

ISSN: 1466-7681

DOI: 10.1111/nup.12230

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd New nursing researchers are faced with a smorgasbord of competing methodologies. Sometimes, they are encouraged to adopt the research paradigms beloved of their senior colleagues. This is a problem if those paradigms are no longer of contemporary methodological relevance. The aim of this paper was to provide clarity about current research paradigms. It seeks to interrogate the continuing viability of positivism as a guiding paradigm for nursing research. It does this by critically analysing the methodological literature. Five major paradigms are addressed: the positivist; the interpretivist/constructivist; the transformative; the realist; and the postpositivist. Acceptance of interpretivist, transformative or realist approaches necessarily entails wholesale rejection of positivism, while acceptance of postpositivism involves its partial rejection. Postpositivism has superseded positivism as the guiding paradigm of the scientific method. The incorporation in randomized controlled trials of postpositivist assumptions indicates that even on the methodological territory that it once claimed as its own, positivism has been rendered redundant as an appropriate paradigm for contemporary nursing research.

This data was imported from Web of Science (Lite):

Authors: Corry, M., Porter, S. and McKenna, H.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31622/

Journal: NURSING PHILOSOPHY

Volume: 20

Issue: 1

eISSN: 1466-769X

ISSN: 1466-7681

DOI: 10.1111/nup.12230

The data on this page was last updated at 05:24 on October 27, 2020.