R v BM: Errors in the Judicial Interpretation of Body Modification

Authors: Walker, S.

http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31872/

https://journals.sagepub.com/

Journal: Journal of Criminal Law

Volume: 83

Issue: 4

Pages: XX

Publisher: Sage Journals

eISSN: 1740-5580

ISSN: 0022-0191

R v BM is the latest case to consider the exceptions to Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA). The exceptions allow an action causing injury that would be a criminal offence to become lawful if the person injured consents to the action. The outcome of this judgement is that body modifications are categorised as medical procedures (and therefore subject to the medical exception only) and new exceptions should not be developed on a case by case basis, instead allocating development of the exceptions to Parliament. Two implications follow from the BM judgement. First, it provided a limited definition of body modifications which are now categorised as medical procedures. Second, their Lordships have restricted further development of the lawful exceptions to offences against the person. This is a lost opportuni-ty for developing the common law exceptions to the OAPA through an autonomy-based lib-eral judicial interpretation.

The data on this page was last updated at 05:09 on February 27, 2020.