The spectatorship of portraits by naïve beholders.

Authors: Trawiński, T., Mestry, N., Harland, B., Liversedge, S.P., Godwin, H.J. and Donnelly, N.

Journal: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Volume: 15

Issue: 1

Pages: 3-19

eISSN: 1931-390X

ISSN: 1931-3896

DOI: 10.1037/aca0000248

Abstract:

The spectatorship of portraits by naïve viewers (beholders) was explored in a single experiment. Twenty-five participants rated their liking for 142 portraits painted by Courbet (36 paintings), Fantin-Latour (36 paintings), and Manet (70 paintings) on a 4-point Likert scale. The portraits were classified in terms of focused versus ambiguous nature of sitter gaze and the presence of salient features in the context beyond sitters. Participants rated portraits while having their eye movements recorded. The portraits were split into regions of interest (ROIs) defined by faces, bodies, and context. Participants also completed individual difference measures of attention and task focus. Results showed naïve spectatorship to be subject to attentional capture by faces. Paradoxically, the presence of salient features in the context amplified the attentional capture by faces through increasing participants liking of portraits. Attentional capture by faces was also influenced by sitter gaze and task focus. Unsurprisingly, the spectatorship of portraits by naïve beholders is dominated by faces, but the extent of this dominance is influenced by exogenous and endogenous attentional factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31895/

Source: Scopus

The Spectatorship of Portraits by Naive Beholders

Authors: Trawinski, T., Mestry, N., Harland, B., Liversedge, S.P., Godwin, H.J. and Donnelly, N.

Journal: PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS

Volume: 15

Issue: 1

Pages: 3-19

eISSN: 1931-390X

ISSN: 1931-3896

DOI: 10.1037/aca0000248

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31895/

Source: Web of Science (Lite)

The Spectatorship of Portraits by Naïve Beholders

Authors: Trawinski, T., Mestry, N., Harland, B., Liversedge, S.P., Godwin, H.J. and Donnelly, N.

Journal: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Publisher: APA

ISSN: 1931-3896

DOI: 10.1037/aca0000248

Abstract:

The spectatorship of portraits by naïve viewers (beholders) was explored in a single experiment. Twenty-five participants rated their liking for 142 portraits painted by Courbet (36 paintings), Fantin-Latour (36 paintings) and Manet (70 paintings) on a 4-point Likert scale. The portraits were classified in terms of focussed versus ambiguous nature of sitter gaze and the presence of salient features in the context beyond sitters. Participants rated portraits while having their eye movements recorded. The portraits were split into regions of interest (ROIs) defined by faces, bodies and context. Participants also completed individual difference measures of attention and task focus. Results showed naïve spectatorship to be subject to attentional capture by faces. Paradoxically, the presence of salient features in the context amplified the attentional capture by faces through increasing participants liking of portraits. Attentional capture by faces was also influenced by sitter gaze and task focus. Unsurprisingly, the spectatorship of portraits by naïve beholders is dominated by faces, but the extent of this dominance is influenced by exogenous and endogenous attentional factors.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31895/

Source: Manual

The Spectatorship of Portraits by Naïve Beholders

Authors: Trawiński, T., Mestry, N., Harland, B., Liversedge, S.P., Godwin, H.J. and Donnelly, N.

Journal: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Volume: 15

Issue: 1

Pages: 3-19

ISSN: 1931-3896

Abstract:

The spectatorship of portraits by naïve viewers (beholders) was explored in a single experiment. Twenty-five participants rated their liking for 142 portraits painted by Courbet (36 paintings), Fantin-Latour (36 paintings) and Manet (70 paintings) on a 4-point Likert scale. The portraits were classified in terms of focussed versus ambiguous nature of sitter gaze and the presence of salient features in the context beyond sitters. Participants rated portraits while having their eye movements recorded. The portraits were split into regions of interest (ROIs) defined by faces, bodies and context. Participants also completed individual difference measures of attention and task focus. Results showed naïve spectatorship to be subject to attentional capture by faces. Paradoxically, the presence of salient features in the context amplified the attentional capture by faces through increasing participants liking of portraits. Attentional capture by faces was also influenced by sitter gaze and task focus. Unsurprisingly, the spectatorship of portraits by naïve beholders is dominated by faces, but the extent of this dominance is influenced by exogenous and endogenous attentional factors.

https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/31895/

Source: BURO EPrints